Natasha Iotov
About
In The Last Decade
Natasha Iotov
4 papers receiving 377 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 18
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering 369
- Materials Chemistry 324
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 52
- Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 50
- Polymers and Plastics 48
Countries citing papers authored by Natasha Iotov
This map shows the geographic impact of Natasha Iotov's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Natasha Iotov with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natasha Iotov more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Natasha Iotov
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Natasha Iotov. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Natasha Iotov. The network helps show where Natasha Iotov may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Natasha Iotov
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Natasha Iotov. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Natasha Iotov based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Natasha Iotov. Natasha Iotov is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 16 | |
| 2 | 55 | |
| 3 | 100 | |
| 4 | 212 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.