Natasha Cornea

13 papers receiving 276 citations

Peers

Natasha Cornea
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
  • Urban Studies 105
  • Political Science and International Relations 181
  • Geography, Planning and Development 35
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering 32
  • Anthropology 18
Replace Jenia Mukherjee with:
Jenia Mukherjee India
Anna Walnycki United Kingdom
Cynthia Morinville Canada
Pascale Hofmann United Kingdom
Bibiana Duarte-Abadía Netherlands
Davison Muchadenyika South Africa
Daniel Kweku Baah Inkoom Ghana
Georges Allaert Belgium
Francesca Pilo’ Netherlands
V.S. Saravanan Germany
Natasha Cornea relative to Jenia Mukherjee India Jenia Mukherjee's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Jenia Mukherjee · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Natasha Cornea

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Natasha Cornea's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Natasha Cornea with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natasha Cornea more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Natasha Cornea

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Natasha Cornea. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Natasha Cornea. The network helps show where Natasha Cornea may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 18 scholars most cited alongside Natasha Cornea, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Natasha Cornea Line = papers co-authored together Natasha Cornea links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1 201777
2 201656
3 201648
4 202035
5 202321
6 201620
7
Urban ponds, environmental imaginaries and (un)commoning: An urban political ecology of the pondscape in a small city in Gujarat, India
202013
8 202310
9 201910
10 20246
11 20164
12 20241
13 20231
14
Urban political ecology: landscapes of power
20180

About Natasha Cornea

Natasha Cornea is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Urban Studies, Sociology and Political Science, Anthropology and Geography, Planning and Development, having authored 14 papers that have together received 302 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Water Governance and Infrastructure (9 papers), Urban Planning and Governance (7 papers), Urban and Rural Development Challenges (5 papers), Geographies of human-animal interactions (3 papers), Anthropological Studies and Insights (3 papers), Child Nutrition and Water Access (2 papers), South Asian Studies and Diaspora (1 paper) and South Asian Studies and Conflicts (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Urban Studies (105 citations), Political Science and International Relations (181 citations), Geography, Planning and Development (35 citations), Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering (32 citations) and Anthropology (18 citations). Natasha Cornea has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Switzerland and United States. Frequent co-authors include Anna Zimmer, René Véron, Yaffa Truelove, Franziska Sielker, Boris Braun, Sophie Schramm, Javier Revilla Diez, Alexander Follmann, Mary Lawhon and Seth Schindler. Their work appears in journals such as Environment and Planning C Politics and Space, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Cultural Geographies, Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography and Environment and Planning A Economy and Space.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact