Natalya Morrow

511 citations
24 papers · 387 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Natalya Morrow

24 papers receiving 384 citations

Peers

Natalya Morrow
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
  • Radiation 147
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 166
  • Cancer Research 97
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 30
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 100
Replace Jacqueline A. Nyamwanda with:
Jacqueline A. Nyamwanda United States
Ken‐Pin Hwang United States
Guangyu Wang China
Mitchell D. Schnall United States
Ahmet S. Ayan United States
Danny Lee United States
Gregg E. Franklin United States
Tingsheng Ling China
Emily Daugherty United States
Consuelo Rosa Italy
Natalya Morrow relative to Jacqueline A. Nyamwanda United States Jacqueline A. Nyamwanda's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.7×
Jacqueline A. Nyamwanda · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Natalya Morrow

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Natalya Morrow's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Natalya Morrow with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natalya Morrow more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Natalya Morrow

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Natalya Morrow. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Natalya Morrow. The network helps show where Natalya Morrow may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Natalya Morrow, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Natalya Morrow Line = papers co-authored together Natalya Morrow links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200252
2 200751
3 201245
4 201040
5 201140
6 200828
7 201125
8 201425
9 200223
10 201318
11 200511
12 20006
13 20234
14 20084
15 20212
16 20082
17 20122
18 20062
19 20072
20 20041

About Natalya Morrow

Natalya Morrow is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Radiation, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Cancer Research, having authored 24 papers that have together received 387 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques (8 papers), Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates (7 papers), Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (5 papers), Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (4 papers), Spectroscopy and Laser Applications (4 papers), Quantum optics and atomic interactions (3 papers), Effects of Radiation Exposure (3 papers) and Advanced Fiber Laser Technologies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Radiation (147 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (166 citations), Cancer Research (97 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (30 citations) and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (100 citations). Natalya Morrow has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Georg Raithel, Julia White, Subrata Dutta, X. Allen Li, J. Frank Wilson, C.A. Lawton, X. Sharon Qi, C. Stepaniak, Tracy Kelly and Meetha Medhora. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, Physical Review A, Brachytherapy, Radiation Research and Physical Review Letters.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact