Nataliya Pushak
- Development top 1%
- Strategy and Management top 10%
- Economics and Econometrics top 10%
- Political Science and International Relations top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Co-authors
- Vivien FosterChuan ChenAlexander A. PopovCecilia Briceño-GarmendíaWilliam H. ButterfieldApurva Sanghi
- Topics
- Public-Private Partnership Projects (17 papers)International Development and Aid (12 papers)Urban and Rural Development Challenges (7 papers)
- Journals
- Utilities PolicyThe World Bank eBooksWorld Bank eBooks
- Partner nations
- Germany
In The Last Decade
Nataliya Pushak
24 papers receiving 266 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
- Development 123
- Strategy and Management 121
- Economics and Econometrics 87
- Political Science and International Relations 64
- Sociology and Political Science 50
Countries citing papers authored by Nataliya Pushak
This map shows the geographic impact of Nataliya Pushak's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nataliya Pushak with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nataliya Pushak more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nataliya Pushak
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nataliya Pushak. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nataliya Pushak. The network helps show where Nataliya Pushak may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nataliya Pushak
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nataliya Pushak. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nataliya Pushak based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nataliya Pushak. Nataliya Pushak is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 14 | |
| 2 | Angola's Infrastructure: A Continental Perspective | 1 |
| 3 | 8 | |
| 4 | 5 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 22 | |
| 7 | 5 | |
| 8 | 12 | |
| 9 | 9 | |
| 10 | 6 | |
| 11 | 3 | |
| 12 | 0 | |
| 13 | 5 | |
| 14 | 5 | |
| 15 | 3 | |
| 16 | Does Private Sector Participation Improve Performance in Electricity and Water Distribution | 11 |
| 17 | 133 | |
| 18 | 3 | |
| 19 | 10 | |
| 20 | 10 |
About Nataliya Pushak
Nataliya Pushak is a scholar working on Development, Urban Studies and Strategy and Management, having authored 25 papers that have together received 356 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Public-Private Partnership Projects (17 papers), International Development and Aid (12 papers) and Urban and Rural Development Challenges (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Development (123 citations), Strategy and Management (121 citations) and General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (43 citations). Nataliya Pushak has collaborated with scholars based in Germany. Frequent co-authors include Vivien Foster, Chuan Chen, Alexander A. Popov, Cecilia Briceño-Garmendía, William H. Butterfield, Chuan Chen and Apurva Sanghi. Their work appears in journals such as Utilities Policy, The World Bank eBooks and World Bank eBooks.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.