Natalie Simpson

1.3k total citations
30 papers, 954 citations indexed

About

Natalie Simpson is a scholar working on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Management Information Systems and Strategy and Management. According to data from OpenAlex, Natalie Simpson has authored 30 papers receiving a total of 954 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 10 papers in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, 9 papers in Management Information Systems and 7 papers in Strategy and Management. Recurrent topics in Natalie Simpson's work include Supply Chain and Inventory Management (8 papers), Facility Location and Emergency Management (8 papers) and Evacuation and Crowd Dynamics (6 papers). Natalie Simpson is often cited by papers focused on Supply Chain and Inventory Management (8 papers), Facility Location and Emergency Management (8 papers) and Evacuation and Crowd Dynamics (6 papers). Natalie Simpson collaborates with scholars based in United States, South Korea and United Kingdom. Natalie Simpson's co-authors include Ş. Selçuk Erengüç, Asoo J. Vakharia, Philip Hancock, Winston T. Lin, Ta‐Wei Kao, Benjamin B. M. Shao, James P. Minas, Timothy J. Hubin, Madeeha Khan and Stephen J. Archibald and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Communications of the ACM and European Journal of Operational Research.

In The Last Decade

Natalie Simpson

29 papers receiving 888 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Natalie Simpson United States 14 393 377 253 204 127 30 954
Jukka Korpela Finland 15 323 0.8× 177 0.5× 273 1.1× 72 0.4× 397 3.1× 52 982
Sushil Gupta United States 19 253 0.6× 656 1.7× 209 0.8× 214 1.0× 174 1.4× 24 1.3k
Gary M. Gaukler United States 14 384 1.0× 182 0.5× 203 0.8× 86 0.4× 62 0.5× 21 785
José Carlos de Toledo Brazil 12 227 0.6× 53 0.1× 241 1.0× 23 0.1× 108 0.9× 92 700
Peng Peng China 8 539 1.4× 132 0.4× 685 2.7× 295 1.4× 80 0.6× 17 1.0k
José Luis Martínez Flores Mexico 11 263 0.7× 210 0.6× 261 1.0× 62 0.3× 52 0.4× 87 653
David Baxter United Kingdom 19 108 0.3× 241 0.6× 272 1.1× 49 0.2× 107 0.8× 56 1.0k
Michael J. Fry United States 16 372 0.9× 170 0.5× 252 1.0× 46 0.2× 125 1.0× 36 709

Countries citing papers authored by Natalie Simpson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Natalie Simpson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Natalie Simpson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natalie Simpson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Natalie Simpson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Natalie Simpson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Natalie Simpson. The network helps show where Natalie Simpson may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Natalie Simpson

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Natalie Simpson. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Natalie Simpson based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Natalie Simpson. Natalie Simpson is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Simpson, Natalie, et al.. (2023). Process Modeling a Radiation Oncology Clinic Workflow From Therapeutic Simulation to Treatment: Identifying Impending Strain and Possible Treatment Delays. Advances in Radiation Oncology. 8(6). 101261–101261. 1 indexed citations
2.
Minas, James P., et al.. (2020). Modeling emergency response operations: A theory building survey. Computers & Operations Research. 119. 104921–104921. 16 indexed citations
3.
Minas, James P., et al.. (2020). Complete bibliographic data, cluster assignments and combined citation network of emergency response operations research extant literature. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 31. 105908–105908. 2 indexed citations
4.
Simpson, Natalie, et al.. (2020). Modeling mycorrhizal fungi dispersal by the mycophagous swamp wallaby (Wallabia bicolor). Ecology and Evolution. 10(23). 12920–12928. 11 indexed citations
5.
Simpson, Natalie & James P. Minas. (2016). Conceptualization and demonstration of the Incident Controller's Problem. Decision Support Systems. 90. 99–111. 5 indexed citations
6.
Lin, Winston T., et al.. (2015). Evaluating the performance of US manufacturing and service operations in the presence of IT: a Bayesian stochastic production frontier approach. International Journal of Production Research. 53(18). 5500–5523. 6 indexed citations
7.
Hubin, Timothy J., Natalie Simpson, Stephen J. Archibald, et al.. (2014). Synthesis and antimalarial activity of metal complexes of cross-bridged tetraazamacrocyclic ligands. Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry. 22(13). 3239–3244. 72 indexed citations
8.
Simpson, Natalie & Philip Hancock. (2011). Project Cheddarfield: Supporting Co‐Curricular Themes Through Creative Use of Video Course‐Casting. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education. 9(2). 235–253. 1 indexed citations
9.
Simpson, Natalie & Philip Hancock. (2010). The Tile Puzzle: An Experiential Exercise in Introductory Management Science. 1(1). 33–46. 1 indexed citations
10.
Sanders, G. Lawrence, et al.. (2010). Future Tense: I, myself and e-myself. Communications of the ACM. 53(6). 154–157. 9 indexed citations
11.
Simpson, Natalie & Philip Hancock. (2009). Fifty years of operational research and emergency response. Journal of the Operational Research Society. 60(sup1). S126–S139. 164 indexed citations
12.
Simpson, Natalie & Philip Hancock. (2009). The incident commander's problem: resource allocation in the context of emergency response. 2(2). 102–102. 8 indexed citations
13.
Simpson, Natalie, et al.. (2008). Hyper-Projects and Emergent Logistics: Characterizing the Managerial Challenges of Emergency Response. Journal of Applied Security Research. 4(1-2). 36–47. 3 indexed citations
14.
Simpson, Natalie. (2006). Central versus local multiple stage inventory planning: An analysis of solutions. European Journal of Operational Research. 181(1). 127–138. 5 indexed citations
15.
Simpson, Natalie. (2006). Asynchronous access to conventional course delivery: a pilot project. British Journal of Educational Technology. 37(4). 527–537. 22 indexed citations
16.
Simpson, Natalie & Ş. Selçuk Erengüç. (2005). Modeling multiple stage manufacturing systems with generalized costs and capacity issues. Naval Research Logistics (NRL). 52(6). 560–570. 13 indexed citations
17.
Simpson, Natalie & Ş. Selçuk Erengüç. (2001). . IIE Transactions. 33(2). 119–130. 25 indexed citations
18.
Erengüç, Ş. Selçuk, Natalie Simpson, & Asoo J. Vakharia. (1999). Integrated production/distribution planning in supply chains: An invited review. European Journal of Operational Research. 115(2). 219–236. 382 indexed citations
19.
Simpson, Natalie & Ş. Selçuk Erengüç. (1998). Improved heuristic methods for multiple stage production planning. Computers & Operations Research. 25(7-8). 611–623. 21 indexed citations
20.
Simpson, Natalie & Ş. Selçuk Erengüç. (1996). Multiple‐stage production planning research: history and opportunities. International Journal of Operations & Production Management. 16(6). 25–40. 12 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026