Natalie Rhodes
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics top 10%
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging top 10%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Biomedical Engineering
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering
- Co-authors
- Matthew J. BrookesNiall HolmesJames OsborneRyan M. HillElena BotoRichard BowtellVishal ShahMolly Rea
- Topics
- Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (11 papers)Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research (9 papers)Neural dynamics and brain function (3 papers)
- Cited by
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and OpticsCognitive NeuroscienceRadiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
- Partner nations
- United KingdomCanadaAustralia
In The Last Decade
Natalie Rhodes
13 papers receiving 430 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 317
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 184
- Cognitive Neuroscience 183
- Biomedical Engineering 57
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering 45
Countries citing papers authored by Natalie Rhodes
This map shows the geographic impact of Natalie Rhodes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Natalie Rhodes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natalie Rhodes more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Natalie Rhodes
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Natalie Rhodes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Natalie Rhodes. The network helps show where Natalie Rhodes may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Natalie Rhodes
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Natalie Rhodes. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Natalie Rhodes based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Natalie Rhodes. Natalie Rhodes is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 5 | |
| 4 | 5 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 19 | |
| 7 | 23 | |
| 8 | 49 | |
| 9 | 121 | |
| 10 | 67 | |
| 11 | 108 | |
| 12 | 6 | |
| 13 | 29 | |
| 14 | 1 |
About Natalie Rhodes
Natalie Rhodes is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Applied Psychology, having authored 14 papers that have together received 436 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (11 papers), Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research (9 papers) and Neural dynamics and brain function (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (317 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (183 citations) and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (184 citations). Natalie Rhodes has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Canada and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Matthew J. Brookes, Niall Holmes, James Osborne, Ryan M. Hill, Elena Boto, Richard Bowtell, Vishal Shah, Molly Rea, James Leggett and Cody Doyle. Their work appears in journals such as NeuroImage, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences and Sensors.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.