Natalie Rhodes

34 total papers · 719 total citations
14 papers, 424 citations indexed

About

Natalie Rhodes is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging. According to data from OpenAlex, Natalie Rhodes has authored 14 papers receiving a total of 424 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 11 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 9 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and 4 papers in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging. Recurrent topics in Natalie Rhodes's work include Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (11 papers), Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research (9 papers) and Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (3 papers). Natalie Rhodes is often cited by papers focused on Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (11 papers), Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research (9 papers) and Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (3 papers). Natalie Rhodes collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Canada and Australia. Natalie Rhodes's co-authors include Matthew J. Brookes, Elena Boto, James Osborne, Richard Bowtell, Vishal Shah, Ryan M. Hill, Niall Holmes, Molly Rea, James Leggett and Cody Doyle and has published in prestigious journals such as NeuroImage, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences and Sensors.

In The Last Decade

Natalie Rhodes

13 papers receiving 418 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
Natalie Rhodes 307 183 176 57 42 14 424
Yasuhiro Haruta 100 0.3× 286 1.6× 68 0.4× 36 0.6× 48 1.1× 27 457
Rasmus Zetter 343 1.1× 222 1.2× 234 1.3× 62 1.1× 66 1.6× 13 471
Amir Borna 341 1.1× 140 0.8× 215 1.2× 53 0.9× 46 1.1× 15 418
Nicholas Alexander 223 0.7× 256 1.4× 132 0.8× 50 0.9× 38 0.9× 15 389
Hans-Jürgen Scheer 285 0.9× 124 0.7× 121 0.7× 38 0.7× 102 2.4× 21 462
Zelekha A. Seedat 236 0.8× 321 1.8× 144 0.8× 32 0.6× 23 0.5× 13 458
Moon Jung Hwang 92 0.3× 49 0.3× 192 1.1× 38 0.7× 80 1.9× 27 471
Tony R. Carter 322 1.0× 122 0.7× 201 1.1× 46 0.8× 44 1.0× 9 378
S. J. Uftring 126 0.4× 98 0.5× 58 0.3× 23 0.4× 190 4.5× 18 417
Masahiro Shimogawara 45 0.1× 248 1.4× 60 0.3× 43 0.8× 16 0.4× 15 369

Countries citing papers authored by Natalie Rhodes

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Natalie Rhodes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Natalie Rhodes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natalie Rhodes more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Natalie Rhodes

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Natalie Rhodes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Natalie Rhodes. The network helps show where Natalie Rhodes may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Natalie Rhodes

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Natalie Rhodes. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Natalie Rhodes based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Natalie Rhodes. Natalie Rhodes is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026