Natalie M. Williams

693 total citations
35 papers, 424 citations indexed

About

Natalie M. Williams is a scholar working on Dermatology, Epidemiology and Oncology. According to data from OpenAlex, Natalie M. Williams has authored 35 papers receiving a total of 424 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 16 papers in Dermatology, 13 papers in Epidemiology and 9 papers in Oncology. Recurrent topics in Natalie M. Williams's work include Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management (9 papers), Dermatologic Treatments and Research (7 papers) and Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer Studies (7 papers). Natalie M. Williams is often cited by papers focused on Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management (9 papers), Dermatologic Treatments and Research (7 papers) and Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer Studies (7 papers). Natalie M. Williams collaborates with scholars based in United States, Saudi Arabia and Australia. Natalie M. Williams's co-authors include Elizabeth Gillespie, Rhonda L. Stuart, Louise Wright, Despina Kotsanas, Jan Bell, Tony M. Korman, Ali Rajabi‐Estarabadi, Kylie Snook, Natalia Jaimes and Keyvan Nouri and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Investigative Dermatology, SLEEP and Neurosurgery.

In The Last Decade

Natalie M. Williams

30 papers receiving 414 citations

Peers

Natalie M. Williams
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
  • Dermatology 112
  • Epidemiology 80
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 77
  • Oncology 74
  • Molecular Medicine 73
Replace Sara Borok with:
Sara Borok Israel
Rita Bardenstein Israel
John Jairo Zuleta Tobón Colombia
Hüseyin Bilgin Türkiye
John Murray United Kingdom
Walter Perbix Germany
Fatma Eser Türkiye
Mohammed Abukhattab Qatar
Eyal Zimlichman Israel
Torsten T. Bauer Germany
Sara Borok Israel View profile →
Citations per field, relative to Natalie M. Williams
Natalie M. Williams · 1×
Citations per year, relative to Natalie M. Williams
Natalie M. Williams · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by Natalie M. Williams

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Natalie M. Williams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Natalie M. Williams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natalie M. Williams more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Natalie M. Williams

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Natalie M. Williams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Natalie M. Williams. The network helps show where Natalie M. Williams may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Natalie M. Williams

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Natalie M. Williams. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Natalie M. Williams based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Natalie M. Williams. Natalie M. Williams is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 0
2 2
3 9
4 4
5 28
6 2
7 7
8 25
9 16
10 30
11 12
12 11
13 1
14 3
15 13
16 17
17 0
18 0
19 11
20 61

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026