Natalie Johns

19 total papers · 601 total citations
11 papers, 441 citations indexed

About

Natalie Johns is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Health and Gender Studies. According to data from OpenAlex, Natalie Johns has authored 11 papers receiving a total of 441 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Clinical Psychology, 4 papers in Health and 4 papers in Gender Studies. Recurrent topics in Natalie Johns's work include Intimate Partner and Family Violence (4 papers), Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders (3 papers) and Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies (3 papers). Natalie Johns is often cited by papers focused on Intimate Partner and Family Violence (4 papers), Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders (3 papers) and Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies (3 papers). Natalie Johns collaborates with scholars based in United States. Natalie Johns's co-authors include Rebecca J. Macy, Eric A. Storch, Gary R. Geffken, Tanya K. Murphy, Wayne K. Goodman, Cynthia Fraga Rizo, Adam B. Lewin, Jennifer W. Adkins, Deborah Roth Ledley and Audrey L. Baumeister and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Anxiety Disorders, Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology and Aggression and Violent Behavior.

In The Last Decade

Natalie Johns

9 papers receiving 413 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
Natalie Johns 337 138 137 96 66 11 441
Erin Whittle 246 0.7× 65 0.5× 64 0.5× 33 0.3× 82 1.2× 17 447
Catherine F. Lewis 339 1.0× 235 1.7× 26 0.2× 65 0.7× 76 1.2× 16 478
Sandra Shrimpton 338 1.0× 107 0.8× 126 0.9× 89 0.9× 94 1.4× 12 490
Judith A. Arroyo 155 0.5× 74 0.5× 41 0.3× 62 0.6× 101 1.5× 12 387
April M. Fritch 209 0.6× 136 1.0× 68 0.5× 85 0.9× 57 0.9× 12 491
Anne F. Brennan 132 0.4× 66 0.5× 92 0.7× 136 1.4× 76 1.2× 14 451
Peggy Loveless 312 0.9× 148 1.1× 30 0.2× 168 1.8× 64 1.0× 6 458
Dena Derkzen 183 0.5× 142 1.0× 88 0.6× 23 0.2× 47 0.7× 16 384
Douglas Murdoch 153 0.5× 145 1.1× 33 0.2× 58 0.6× 61 0.9× 12 439
Melissa Henry 115 0.3× 136 1.0× 138 1.0× 36 0.4× 86 1.3× 9 422

Countries citing papers authored by Natalie Johns

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Natalie Johns's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Natalie Johns with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natalie Johns more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Natalie Johns

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Natalie Johns. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Natalie Johns. The network helps show where Natalie Johns may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Natalie Johns

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Natalie Johns. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Natalie Johns based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Natalie Johns. Natalie Johns is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026