Natalie J. Forde
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 10%
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging top 10%
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
- Co-authors
- Jan K. BuitelaarPieter J. HoekstraDara M. CannonAlexander LeemansMuhammad MamdaniJilly NaaijenSophie E.A. AkkermansThaïra J. C. Openneer
- Topics
- Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications (14 papers)Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (12 papers)Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (12 papers)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsUnited KingdomCanada
In The Last Decade
Natalie J. Forde
35 papers receiving 635 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 103
- Cognitive Neuroscience 320
- Psychiatry and Mental health 179
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 171
- Clinical Psychology 110
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 60
Countries citing papers authored by Natalie J. Forde
This map shows the geographic impact of Natalie J. Forde's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Natalie J. Forde with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natalie J. Forde more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Natalie J. Forde
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Natalie J. Forde. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Natalie J. Forde. The network helps show where Natalie J. Forde may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Natalie J. Forde
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Natalie J. Forde. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Natalie J. Forde based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Natalie J. Forde. Natalie J. Forde is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 19 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 5 | |
| 5 | 11 | |
| 6 | 15 | |
| 7 | 31 | |
| 8 | 22 | |
| 9 | 35 | |
| 10 | 26 | |
| 11 | 10 | |
| 12 | 27 | |
| 13 | 13 | |
| 14 | 7 | |
| 15 | 27 | |
| 16 | 17 | |
| 17 | 31 | |
| 18 | 34 | |
| 19 | 37 | |
| 20 | 33 |
About Natalie J. Forde
Natalie J. Forde is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Psychiatry and Mental health and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, having authored 36 papers that have together received 643 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications (14 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (12 papers) and Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (12 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (320 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (179 citations) and Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (16 citations). Natalie J. Forde has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Jan K. Buitelaar, Pieter J. Hoekstra, Dara M. Cannon, Alexander Leemans, Muhammad Mamdani, Jilly Naaijen, Sophie E.A. Akkermans, Thaïra J. C. Openneer, Marcel P. Zwiers and Andrea Dietrich. Their work appears in journals such as Nature Communications, NeuroImage and Biological Psychiatry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.