Natalie Halladin

19 papers receiving 605 citations

Peers

Natalie Halladin
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 321
  • Molecular Biology 243
  • Surgery 118
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 76
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 74
Replace Matthew Arbuckle with:
Matthew Arbuckle United States
Amélie Paquette Canada
Hui‐Yu Bai Japan
Xing Tan China
Christina D. Tulbert United States
Ragnar Henningsson Sweden
Gbenga G. Sofowora United States
Paulina Salazar Chile
Chih‐Wei Wu Taiwan
Binxiao Su China
Natalie Halladin relative to Matthew Arbuckle United States Matthew Arbuckle's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×9.5×
Matthew Arbuckle · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Natalie Halladin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Natalie Halladin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Natalie Halladin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natalie Halladin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Natalie Halladin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Natalie Halladin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Natalie Halladin. The network helps show where Natalie Halladin may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Natalie Halladin

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Natalie Halladin. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Natalie Halladin based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Natalie Halladin. Natalie Halladin is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 5
2 7
3 49
4 54
5 3
6 3
7 139
8 10
9 43
10 57
11 2
12
Oxidative and inflammatory biomarkers of ischemia and reperfusion injuries.
80
13
Melatonin does not affect oxidative/inflammatory biomarkers in a closed-chest porcine model of acute myocardial infarction.
10
14 71
15 23
16
Intracoronary and systemic melatonin to patients with acute myocardial infarction: protocol for the IMPACT trial.
18
17 25
18 18
19
[Closed-chest porcine model is superior in intervention studies of ischaemia reperfusion injury].
5

About Natalie Halladin

Natalie Halladin is a scholar working on Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Developmental Neuroscience, having authored 19 papers that have together received 622 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Diabetes Treatment and Management (10 papers), Metabolism, Diabetes, and Cancer (9 papers) and Diabetes Management and Research (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (321 citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (74 citations) and Developmental Neuroscience (37 citations). Natalie Halladin has collaborated with scholars based in Denmark, United States and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Ismail Gögenür, Jacob Rosenberg, Liana K. Billings, Randi Grøn, Nikolaοs Tentolouris, Esteban Jódar, D. Gouet, Helena W. Rodbard, Ankur Doshi and Stewart B. Harris. Their work appears in journals such as Diabetes Care, Diabetes and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026