Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Bringing together the World Health Organization's QualityRights initiative and the World Psychiatric Association's programme on implementing alternatives to coercion in mental healthcare: a common goal for action
202428 citationsNeeraj Gill, Natalie Drew et al.BJPsych Openprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Natalie Drew's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Natalie Drew with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natalie Drew more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Natalie Drew. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Natalie Drew. The network helps show where Natalie Drew may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Natalie Drew
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Natalie Drew.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Natalie Drew based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Natalie Drew. Natalie Drew is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Gill, Neeraj, Natalie Drew, Maria de Lourdes Veronese Rodrigues, et al.. (2024). Bringing together the World Health Organization's QualityRights initiative and the World Psychiatric Association's programme on implementing alternatives to coercion in mental healthcare: a common goal for action. BJPsych Open. 10(1). e23–e23.28 indexed citations breakdown →
Funk, Michelle, Crick Lund, Melvyn Freeman, & Natalie Drew. (2009). Improving the quality of mental health care. International Journal for Quality in Health Care. 21(6). 415–420.12 indexed citations
14.
Mwanza, Jason, Bupe Getrude Mwanza, John Mayeya, et al.. (2008). Phase 1 country report: mental health policy development and implementation in Zambia: a situation analysis..7 indexed citations
15.
Lund, Crick, Sharon Kleintjes, Inge Petersen, et al.. (2008). Mental health policy development and implementation in South Africa: a situationanalysis. Phase 1 Country report..24 indexed citations
16.
Saraceno, Benedetto, et al.. (2008). Integrating mental health into primary healthcare.. PubMed. 5(1). 5–8.57 indexed citations
17.
Doku, Victor, Angela Ofori-Atta, Bright Akpalu, et al.. (2008). Phase 1. Country report: a situation analysis of mental health policy development and implementation in Ghana..11 indexed citations
18.
Drew, Natalie, et al.. (2006). Mental health and human rights. In H. Herrman, S. Saxena & R. Moodie (Eds.).1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.