Natalie Danford

446 total citations
19 papers, 365 citations indexed

About

Natalie Danford is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cancer Research and Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis. According to data from OpenAlex, Natalie Danford has authored 19 papers receiving a total of 365 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 12 papers in Molecular Biology, 10 papers in Cancer Research and 5 papers in Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis. Recurrent topics in Natalie Danford's work include Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment (10 papers), DNA Repair Mechanisms (4 papers) and Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals (4 papers). Natalie Danford is often cited by papers focused on Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment (10 papers), DNA Repair Mechanisms (4 papers) and Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals (4 papers). Natalie Danford collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom. Natalie Danford's co-authors include James M. Parry, J. A. Beardmore, U. Kliesch, I.‐D. Adler, Elizabeth M. Parry, Philip E. Wilcox, W. Duncan, Alan E H Emery, Louise N. Paton and R. Anand and has published in prestigious journals such as The Lancet, Environmental Health Perspectives and Mutation Research/Reviews in Genetic Toxicology.

In The Last Decade

Natalie Danford

19 papers receiving 335 citations

Peers

Natalie Danford
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
  • Cancer Research 199
  • Molecular Biology 153
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 79
  • Plant Science 60
  • Genetics 49
Replace Lawrence R. Valcovic with:
Lawrence R. Valcovic United States
G. Stephanou Greece
Håkan Cederberg Sweden
Miguel A. Comendador Spain
Ingeborg A. Brand Germany
N.A. Demopoulos Greece
A.S.C. Medcalf United Kingdom
Jule Griebrok Jose United States
Ursula Hennig Canada
Chun‐Yang Fan China
Lawrence R. Valcovic United States View profile →
Citations per field, relative to Natalie Danford
Natalie Danford · 1×
Citations per year, relative to Natalie Danford
Natalie Danford · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by Natalie Danford

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Natalie Danford's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Natalie Danford with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natalie Danford more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Natalie Danford

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Natalie Danford. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Natalie Danford. The network helps show where Natalie Danford may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Natalie Danford

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Natalie Danford. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Natalie Danford based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Natalie Danford. Natalie Danford is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 5
2
Best New American Voices
1
3 21
4 27
5 34
6 7
7 6
8
The genetic activity and metabolism of dinitropyrenes in eucaryotic cells.
2
9 2
10 1
11 32
12 27
13 45
14 67
15 1
16 12
17 28
18 42
19 5

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026