Natalie Armstrong

4.0k total citations
95 papers, 1.5k citations indexed

About

Natalie Armstrong is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Economics and Econometrics. According to data from OpenAlex, Natalie Armstrong has authored 95 papers receiving a total of 1.5k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 49 papers in General Health Professions, 23 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and 15 papers in Economics and Econometrics. Recurrent topics in Natalie Armstrong's work include Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (12 papers), Healthcare cost, quality, practices (11 papers) and Health Policy Implementation Science (8 papers). Natalie Armstrong is often cited by papers focused on Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (12 papers), Healthcare cost, quality, practices (11 papers) and Health Policy Implementation Science (8 papers). Natalie Armstrong collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Canada. Natalie Armstrong's co-authors include Graham Martin, Mary Dixon‐Woods, Emma‐Louise Aveling, John Powell, Georgia Herbert, Robyn Lotto, Elizabeth Murphy, Lucy Smith, Nicola Mackintosh and Paul Hilton and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Annals of Internal Medicine and Journal of Climate.

In The Last Decade

Natalie Armstrong

90 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Natalie Armstrong United Kingdom 23 736 307 168 157 128 95 1.5k
M.A.H. Fleuren Netherlands 14 660 0.9× 356 1.2× 145 0.9× 108 0.7× 136 1.1× 60 1.3k
Sukyung Chung United States 25 671 0.9× 300 1.0× 85 0.5× 177 1.1× 242 1.9× 96 1.8k
Shoba Ramanadhan United States 20 1.0k 1.4× 255 0.8× 124 0.7× 166 1.1× 195 1.5× 71 1.8k
Adam T. Perzynski United States 27 516 0.7× 218 0.7× 169 1.0× 312 2.0× 135 1.1× 112 1.9k
Cati Brown‐Johnson United States 19 667 0.9× 438 1.4× 93 0.6× 86 0.5× 110 0.9× 101 1.4k
Maureen Maurer United States 10 1.1k 1.5× 320 1.0× 84 0.5× 121 0.8× 200 1.6× 21 1.6k
Jamie Murdoch United Kingdom 24 696 0.9× 425 1.4× 152 0.9× 195 1.2× 248 1.9× 127 2.2k
Kristin L. Carman United States 16 1.4k 1.9× 394 1.3× 109 0.6× 143 0.9× 304 2.4× 31 2.0k
Rebecca Etz United States 20 969 1.3× 314 1.0× 74 0.4× 229 1.5× 265 2.1× 77 1.4k
Annemiek J. Linn Netherlands 16 609 0.8× 201 0.7× 156 0.9× 81 0.5× 77 0.6× 55 1.2k

Countries citing papers authored by Natalie Armstrong

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Natalie Armstrong's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Natalie Armstrong with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natalie Armstrong more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Natalie Armstrong

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Natalie Armstrong. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Natalie Armstrong. The network helps show where Natalie Armstrong may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Natalie Armstrong

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Natalie Armstrong. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Natalie Armstrong based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Natalie Armstrong. Natalie Armstrong is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Pilnick, Alison, et al.. (2025). Disclosing the Decision to Decline Breast Screening and/or Breast Cancer Treatment Due to Concerns About Overdiagnosis and Overtreatment. Health Expectations. 28(5). e70468–e70468. 1 indexed citations
2.
Reed, Julie, Grazia Antonacci, Natalie Armstrong, et al.. (2025). What is improvement science, and what makes it different? An outline of the field and its frontiers. Frontiers in Health Services. 4. 1454658–1454658. 3 indexed citations
3.
Williams, Christopher, et al.. (2025). Deteriorating care home residents as ‘matter out of place’ in both care homes and hospitals: An ethnographic study. Social Science & Medicine. 373. 118012–118012.
4.
5.
Houchen‐Wolloff, Linzy, Claire Hastie, Natalie Armstrong, et al.. (2023). A typology of healthcare pathways after hospital discharge for adults with COVID-19: the evolution of UK services during pandemic conditions. ERJ Open Research. 9(4). 565–2022. 2 indexed citations
6.
7.
Williams, Marie, et al.. (2023). Diagnostic delays for breathlessness in primary care: a qualitative study to investigate current care and inform future pathways. British Journal of General Practice. 73(731). e468–e477. 9 indexed citations
8.
Hoare, Sarah, et al.. (2023). Why do people choose not to take part in screening? Qualitative interview study of atrial fibrillation screening nonparticipation. Health Expectations. 26(6). 2216–2227. 6 indexed citations
9.
Armstrong, Natalie, et al.. (2022). ‘Weighing up risks’: a model of care home staff decision-making about potential resident hospital transfers. Age and Ageing. 51(7). 9 indexed citations
10.
Hoare, Sarah, Alison Powell, Natalie Armstrong, et al.. (2022). Why do people take part in atrial fibrillation screening? Qualitative interview study in English primary care. BMJ Open. 12(3). e051703–e051703. 8 indexed citations
11.
Mackintosh, Nicola, et al.. (2022). Curating the digital space: Structural gate-keeping and boundary work in maternity care. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 2. 100145–100145. 1 indexed citations
12.
Williams, Christopher, et al.. (2022). Hospital transfers from care homes: conceptualising staff decision-making as a form of risk work. Health Risk & Society. 24(7-8). 317–335. 2 indexed citations
13.
Armstrong, Natalie, et al.. (2021). Using advance and emergency care plans during transfer decisions: A grounded theory interview study with care home staff. Palliative Medicine. 36(1). 200–207. 10 indexed citations
14.
Williams, Marie, et al.. (2021). Breathless and awaiting diagnosis in UK lockdown for COVID-19…We’re stuck. npj Primary Care Respiratory Medicine. 31(1). 21–21. 4 indexed citations
15.
16.
Mackintosh, Nicola, Shona Agarwal, Natalie Armstrong, et al.. (2020). Online resources and apps to aid self-diagnosis and help seeking in the perinatal period: A descriptive survey of women's experiences. Midwifery. 90. 102803–102803. 27 indexed citations
17.
18.
Armstrong, Natalie, Liz Brewster, Carolyn Tarrant, et al.. (2018). Taking the heat or taking the temperature? A qualitative study of a large-scale exercise in seeking to measure for improvement, not blame. Social Science & Medicine. 198. 157–164. 22 indexed citations
19.
Tincello, Douglas G., Natalie Armstrong, Paul Hilton, Brian S Buckley, & Christopher Mayne. (2017). Surgery for recurrent stress urinary incontinence: the views of surgeons and women. International Urogynecology Journal. 29(1). 45–54. 15 indexed citations
20.
Armstrong, Natalie & Kenneth James. (1990). Understanding experimental design and interpretation in pharmaceutics. Ellis Horwood eBooks. 25 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by M.A.H. Fleuren Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Sukyung Chung Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Shoba Ramanadhan Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Adam T. Perzynski Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Cati Brown‐Johnson Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Maureen Maurer Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Jamie Murdoch Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Kristin L. Carman Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Rebecca Etz Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Annemiek J. Linn
Rankless by CCL
2026