Natalia Stepanova

562 citations
91 papers · 293 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Natalia Stepanova

55 papers receiving 195 citations

Peers

Natalia Stepanova
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
  • Nephrology 112
  • Complementary and Manual Therapy 27
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 81
  • Biological Psychiatry 6
  • Urology 12
Replace Hark Rım with:
Hark Rım South Korea
Nicholas Cole United Kingdom
Fabiola Martín-del-Campo Mexico
Domenico Giannese Italy
Mohammad A. Shafiee Canada
Niels Erik Frandsen Denmark
Matteo Bargagli Italy
Seolhye Kim South Korea
Chia‐Jen Shih Taiwan
Natalia Stepanova relative to Hark Rım South Korea Hark Rım's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.8×
Hark Rım · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Natalia Stepanova

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Natalia Stepanova's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Natalia Stepanova with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natalia Stepanova more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Natalia Stepanova

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Natalia Stepanova. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Natalia Stepanova. The network helps show where Natalia Stepanova may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 19 scholars most cited alongside Natalia Stepanova, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Natalia Stepanova Line = papers co-authored together Natalia Stepanova links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 91 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202215
2 202314
3 202114
4 201913
5 201713
6 201912
7 202411
8 202211
9 202310
10 202110
11
[Proinflammatory cytokines in patients with pyelonephritis].
201310
12 20199
13 20219
14 20228
15 20248
16 20207
17 20217
18 20246
19 20236
20 20186

About Natalia Stepanova

Natalia Stepanova is a scholar working on Nephrology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Surgery, Epidemiology and Complementary and Manual Therapy, having authored 91 papers that have together received 293 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Kidney Stones and Urolithiasis Treatments (22 papers), Dialysis and Renal Disease Management (18 papers), Urinary Tract Infections Management (11 papers), Therapeutic Uses of Natural Elements (11 papers), Long-Term Effects of COVID-19 (7 papers), Muscle and Compartmental Disorders (6 papers), COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies (6 papers) and Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nephrology (112 citations), Complementary and Manual Therapy (27 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (81 citations), Biological Psychiatry (6 citations) and Urology (12 citations). Natalia Stepanova has collaborated with scholars based in Ukraine, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include М. Kolesnyk, Ganna Tolstanova, Josefine Pernes, Анна Петрова, James M. Shultz, Staffan I. Lindberg, Michael Coppedge, Jan Teorell, Svend‐Erik Skaaning and Szymon Brzόsko. Their work appears in journals such as Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, Journal of Hypertension, Atherosclerosis, Biomedicines and Frontiers in Pharmacology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact