Natalia Kuritz
About
In The Last Decade
Natalia Kuritz
7 papers receiving 420 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 43
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering 174
- Materials Chemistry 151
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 117
- Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 102
- Organic Chemistry 79
Countries citing papers authored by Natalia Kuritz
This map shows the geographic impact of Natalia Kuritz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Natalia Kuritz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natalia Kuritz more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Natalia Kuritz
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Natalia Kuritz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Natalia Kuritz. The network helps show where Natalia Kuritz may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Natalia Kuritz
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Natalia Kuritz. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Natalia Kuritz based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Natalia Kuritz. Natalia Kuritz is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 12 | |
| 2 | 13 | |
| 3 | 27 | |
| 4 | 16 | |
| 5 | 80 | |
| 6 | 219 | |
| 7 | 54 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.