Natalia Conde e Silva

1.0k total citations
17 papers, 837 citations indexed

About

Natalia Conde e Silva is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Plant Science and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics. According to data from OpenAlex, Natalia Conde e Silva has authored 17 papers receiving a total of 837 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 17 papers in Molecular Biology, 9 papers in Plant Science and 2 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics. Recurrent topics in Natalia Conde e Silva's work include Plant Molecular Biology Research (8 papers), Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics (7 papers) and Plant Reproductive Biology (6 papers). Natalia Conde e Silva is often cited by papers focused on Plant Molecular Biology Research (8 papers), Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics (7 papers) and Plant Reproductive Biology (6 papers). Natalia Conde e Silva collaborates with scholars based in France, United States and Austria. Natalia Conde e Silva's co-authors include Dao‐Xiu Zhou, Caroline Servet, Ariel Prunell, Andrei Sivolob, Jean‐Marc Victor, Jean‐Louis Viovy, Maria Barbi, Christophe Lavelle, Aurélien Bancaud and Julien Mozziconacci and has published in prestigious journals such as Molecular Cell, PLoS ONE and Journal of Molecular Biology.

In The Last Decade

Natalia Conde e Silva

17 papers receiving 829 citations

Peers

Natalia Conde e Silva
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
  • Molecular Biology 706
  • Plant Science 447
  • Cell Biology 45
  • Genetics 44
  • Biomedical Engineering 27
Replace Guan‐Feng Wang with:
Guan‐Feng Wang China
Monica Colombo Italy
Emilio Gutiérrez-Beltrán Sweden
Wenqiang Wu China
Peter Stein Nielsen Denmark
David J. Smith United States
Jun-Young Kim South Korea
A.F. Beven United Kingdom
Magdalena Marek Germany
Marie Scarabel United Kingdom
Guan‐Feng Wang China View profile →
Citations per field, relative to Natalia Conde e Silva
Natalia Conde e Silva · 1×
Citations per year, relative to Natalia Conde e Silva
Natalia Conde e Silva · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by Natalia Conde e Silva

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Natalia Conde e Silva's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Natalia Conde e Silva with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natalia Conde e Silva more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Natalia Conde e Silva

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Natalia Conde e Silva. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Natalia Conde e Silva. The network helps show where Natalia Conde e Silva may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Natalia Conde e Silva

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Natalia Conde e Silva. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Natalia Conde e Silva based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Natalia Conde e Silva. Natalia Conde e Silva is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 7
2 8
3 5
4 4
5 4
6 15
7 76
8 81
9 6
10 20
11 21
12 160
13 18
14 112
15 115
16 136
17 49

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026