Natacha Bies‐Etheve
Impact in
- Plant Science top 5%
- Plant Molecular Biology Research
- Plant Stress Responses and Tolerance
- Plant nutrient uptake and metabolism
- Seed Germination and Physiology
-
- Photosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms
- Plant tissue culture and regeneration
- Plant Gene Expression Analysis
- Plant Reproductive Biology
Papers in
-
- Plant Molecular Biology Research 9
- Plant nutrient uptake and metabolism 4
- Plant Genetic and Mutation Studies 2
- Chromosomal and Genetic Variations 2
-
- Plant Gene Expression Analysis 3
- Plant Reproductive Biology 3
- Plant tissue culture and regeneration 3
- Photosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms 2
- Co-authors
- Michel DelsenyRichard CookeMaarten KoornneefKaren M. Léon‐KloosterzielLorette AspartManuel Echeverrı́aCristel C. CarlesEdouard Jobet
- Journals
- eLife (2 papers)Plant Molecular Biology (2 papers)Genes & Development (1 paper)FEBS Letters (1 paper)Epigenetics (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- FrancePolandNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Natacha Bies‐Etheve
11 papers receiving 835 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
- Plant Science 748
- Molecular Biology 481
- Horticulture 4
- Endocrinology 15
- Agronomy and Crop Science 19
Countries citing papers authored by Natacha Bies‐Etheve
This map shows the geographic impact of Natacha Bies‐Etheve's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Natacha Bies‐Etheve with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natacha Bies‐Etheve more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Natacha Bies‐Etheve
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Natacha Bies‐Etheve. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Natacha Bies‐Etheve. The network helps show where Natacha Bies‐Etheve may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Natacha Bies‐Etheve, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2023 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2023 | 4 | |
| 3 | 2016 | 60 | |
| 4 | 2015 | 14 | |
| 5 | 2011 | 15 | |
| 6 | 2010 | 24 | |
| 7 | 2009 | 121 | |
| 8 | 2008 | 244 | |
| 9 | 2002 | 260 | |
| 10 | 2001 | 47 | |
| 11 | 1999 | 63 |
About Natacha Bies‐Etheve
Natacha Bies‐Etheve is a scholar working on Plant Science, Molecular Biology, Infectious Diseases, Organic Chemistry and Surgery, having authored 11 papers that have together received 853 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant Molecular Biology Research (9 papers), Plant nutrient uptake and metabolism (4 papers), Plant Gene Expression Analysis (3 papers), Plant Reproductive Biology (3 papers), Plant tissue culture and regeneration (3 papers), Plant Genetic and Mutation Studies (2 papers), Photosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms (2 papers) and Chromosomal and Genetic Variations (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Plant Science (748 citations), Molecular Biology (481 citations), Horticulture (4 citations), Endocrinology (15 citations) and Agronomy and Crop Science (19 citations). Natacha Bies‐Etheve has collaborated with scholars based in France, Poland and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Michel Delseny, Richard Cooke, Maarten Koornneef, Karen M. Léon‐Kloosterziel, Lorette Aspart, Manuel Echeverrı́a, Cristel C. Carles, Edouard Jobet, Monique Raynal and Thierry Lagrange. Their work appears in journals such as eLife, Plant Molecular Biology, Genes & Development, FEBS Letters and Epigenetics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.