Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Psychometric properties of a Persian-language version of the Beck Depression Inventory - Second edition: BDI-II-PERSIAN
2005635 citationsHabibollah Ghassemzadeh, Ramin Mojtabai et al.Depression and Anxietyprofile →
Citations per year, relative to Narges Ebrahimkhani Narges Ebrahimkhani (= 1×)
peers
Narges Karamghadiri
Countries citing papers authored by Narges Ebrahimkhani
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Narges Ebrahimkhani's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Narges Ebrahimkhani with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Narges Ebrahimkhani more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Narges Ebrahimkhani
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Narges Ebrahimkhani. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Narges Ebrahimkhani. The network helps show where Narges Ebrahimkhani may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Narges Ebrahimkhani
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Narges Ebrahimkhani.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Narges Ebrahimkhani based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Narges Ebrahimkhani. Narges Ebrahimkhani is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
12 of 12 papers shown
1.
Raisi, Firoozeh, et al.. (2016). Sexual Function and Marital Satisfaction in Female with Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.1 indexed citations
Raisi, Firoozeh, et al.. (2015). Sexual dysfunction in Obsessive-Compulsive disorder. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 73(2). 101–109.
4.
Shams, Giti, et al.. (2011). Psychometric Properties of the Persian Version of the Padua Inventory: Washington State University Revision (PI-WSUR).. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.3 indexed citations
5.
Shams, Giti, et al.. (2011). Psychometric Properties of the Persian Version of the Padua Inventory: Washington State University Revision (PI-WSUR).. PubMed. 6(1). 12–8.13 indexed citations
6.
Shams, Giti, et al.. (2011). Prevalence rates of obsessive-compulsive symptoms and psychiatric comorbidity among adolescents in Iran.. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 49(10). 680–7.19 indexed citations
Kaviani, H, et al.. (2009). Reliability and validity of Anxiety and Depression Hospital Scales (HADS): Iranian patients with anxiety and depression disorders. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.63 indexed citations
Ghassemzadeh, Habibollah, Ramin Mojtabai, Narges Karamghadiri, & Narges Ebrahimkhani. (2005). Psychometric properties of a Persian-language version of the Beck Depression Inventory - Second edition: BDI-II-PERSIAN. Depression and Anxiety. 21(4). 185–192.635 indexed citations breakdown →
12.
Kaviani, H, et al.. (2005). MOOD SWINGS IN DIFFERENT WEATHERS AND DURING SEASONAL CHANGES IN NORMAL POPULATION. Iranian Journal of Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology. 11(241). 194–203.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.