Naomi Laventhal

1.4k total citations
56 papers, 609 citations indexed

About

Naomi Laventhal is a scholar working on Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and General Health Professions. According to data from OpenAlex, Naomi Laventhal has authored 56 papers receiving a total of 609 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 39 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, 20 papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and 15 papers in General Health Professions. Recurrent topics in Naomi Laventhal's work include Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare (25 papers), Neonatal Respiratory Health Research (18 papers) and Infant Development and Preterm Care (12 papers). Naomi Laventhal is often cited by papers focused on Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare (25 papers), Neonatal Respiratory Health Research (18 papers) and Infant Development and Preterm Care (12 papers). Naomi Laventhal collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Naomi Laventhal's co-authors include Tiffany G. Munzer, Tiffany R. Bellomo, Stephanie Kukora, John D. Lantos, Beth A. Tarini, Bree Andrews, William Meadow, Annie Janvier, Douglas J. Opel and Robert Macauley and has published in prestigious journals such as Blood, Annals of Internal Medicine and Neurology.

In The Last Decade

Naomi Laventhal

51 papers receiving 591 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Naomi Laventhal United States 14 305 159 147 124 115 56 609
Debra Jeffs United Kingdom 11 265 0.9× 90 0.6× 103 0.7× 35 0.3× 112 1.0× 21 567
Denise B. Angst United States 16 332 1.1× 71 0.4× 217 1.5× 115 0.9× 148 1.3× 33 760
Joyce K. Edmonds United States 20 682 2.2× 117 0.7× 220 1.5× 165 1.3× 152 1.3× 58 1.1k
Sarah E Seaton United Kingdom 18 709 2.3× 483 3.0× 100 0.7× 101 0.8× 111 1.0× 57 1.1k
Aaron Wightman United States 16 270 0.9× 41 0.3× 211 1.4× 95 0.8× 172 1.5× 69 706
Robert Macauley United States 10 421 1.4× 33 0.2× 306 2.1× 105 0.8× 271 2.4× 41 756
Jane Flanagan United States 15 95 0.3× 58 0.4× 112 0.8× 95 0.8× 171 1.5× 59 582
Hala Mahmoud Obeidat Jordan 9 455 1.5× 138 0.9× 93 0.6× 93 0.8× 47 0.4× 31 619
Sarah Masefield United Kingdom 12 103 0.3× 565 3.6× 66 0.4× 125 1.0× 77 0.7× 23 866
Barbara Farlow Canada 12 676 2.2× 248 1.6× 218 1.5× 128 1.0× 106 0.9× 18 851

Countries citing papers authored by Naomi Laventhal

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Naomi Laventhal's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Naomi Laventhal with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Naomi Laventhal more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Naomi Laventhal

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Naomi Laventhal. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Naomi Laventhal. The network helps show where Naomi Laventhal may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Naomi Laventhal

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Naomi Laventhal. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Naomi Laventhal based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Naomi Laventhal. Naomi Laventhal is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
2.
Opel, Douglas J., Douglas S. Diekema, Naomi Laventhal, et al.. (2025). New and Evolving Dimensions in the Pediatrician-Family-Patient Relationship: Maintaining and Managing Boundaries: Clinical Report. PEDIATRICS. 156(1).
3.
Wasserman, Jason Adam, et al.. (2024). Pediatric Assent in Clinical Practice: A Critical Scoping Review. AJOB Empirical Bioethics. 15(4). 336–346. 1 indexed citations
4.
Cortezzo, DonnaMaria E., et al.. (2024). Navigating the post-Dobbs landscape: ethical considerations from a perinatal perspective. Journal of Perinatology. 44(5). 628–634. 2 indexed citations
5.
6.
Macauley, Robert, Robert Macauley, Naomi Laventhal, et al.. (2023). Responding to Parental Requests for Nondisclosure to Patients of Diagnostic and Prognostic Information in the Setting of Serious Disease. PEDIATRICS. 152(4). 1 indexed citations
7.
Vance, Ashlee J., et al.. (2021). Visitor Guidelines in US Children’s Hospitals During COVID-19. Hospital Pediatrics. 11(6). e83–e89. 15 indexed citations
8.
Laventhal, Naomi, et al.. (2021). Prognostic value of clinicians' predictions of neonatal outcomes in counseling at the margin of gestational viability. Seminars in Perinatology. 46(3). 151523–151523. 3 indexed citations
9.
Statter, Mindy B., Garey Noritz, Robert Macauley, et al.. (2020). Children With Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities as Organ Transplantation Recipients. PEDIATRICS. 145(5). 12 indexed citations
10.
Laventhal, Naomi, Katie A. Fritz, Meenu Jain, et al.. (2020). Ethical Cultures in Perinatal Care: Do They Exist? Correlation of Provider Attitudes with Periviability Practices at Six Centers. American Journal of Perinatology. 38(S 01). e193–e200. 6 indexed citations
11.
Laventhal, Naomi, et al.. (2020). Shifting Provider Attitudes and Institutional Resources Surrounding Resuscitation at the Limit of Gestational Viability. American Journal of Perinatology. 39(8). 869–877. 12 indexed citations
12.
Edmonds, Brownsyne Tucker, William F. Fadel, Bree Andrews, et al.. (2020). Intention to treat: obstetrical management at the threshold of viability. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology MFM. 2(2). 100096–100096. 6 indexed citations
13.
Guillén, Úrsula, Amy Mackley, Naomi Laventhal, et al.. (2019). Evaluating the Use of a Decision Aid for Parents Facing Extremely Premature Delivery: A Randomized Trial. The Journal of Pediatrics. 209. 52–60.e1. 28 indexed citations
14.
Fallat, Mary E., Courtney Hardy, Rebecka L. Meyers, et al.. (2018). Interpretation of Do Not Attempt Resuscitation Orders for Children Requiring Anesthesia and Surgery. PEDIATRICS. 141(5). 4 indexed citations
15.
Laventhal, Naomi, et al.. (2017). Should Long-Term Consequences of NICU Care Be Discussed in Terms of Prognostic Uncertainty or Possible Harm?. The AMA Journal of Ethic. 19(8). 743–752. 9 indexed citations
16.
Laventhal, Naomi & Marjorie C. Treadwell. (2017). Ethical considerations in the care of complicated twin pregnancies. Seminars in Fetal and Neonatal Medicine. 23(1). 7–12. 1 indexed citations
17.
Myers, Patrick, Naomi Laventhal, Bree Andrews, Joanne Lagatta, & William Meadow. (2016). Population-Based Outcomes Data for Counseling at the Margin of Gestational Viability. The Journal of Pediatrics. 181. 208–212.e4. 10 indexed citations
18.
Kukora, Stephanie, et al.. (2016). Prognostic accuracy of antenatal neonatology consultation. Journal of Perinatology. 37(1). 27–31. 15 indexed citations
19.
Fifer, Carlen G., et al.. (2016). Perinatal Decision Making for Preterm Infants with Congenital Heart Disease: Determinable Risk Factors for Mortality. Pediatric Cardiology. 37(5). 938–945. 12 indexed citations
20.
Laventhal, Naomi, Miriam Shuchman, & David E. Sandberg. (2013). Warning about Warnings: Weighing Risk and Benefit When Information Is in a State of Flux. Hormone Research in Paediatrics. 79(1). 4–8. 5 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Debra Jeffs Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Denise B. Angst Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Joyce K. Edmonds Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Sarah E Seaton Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Aaron Wightman Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Robert Macauley Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Jane Flanagan Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Hala Mahmoud Obeidat Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Sarah Masefield Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Barbara Farlow
Rankless by CCL
2026