Naomi Dove
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- General Health Professions top 10%
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
- Co-authors
- Hasina SamjiDavid LongJudy WuS. Evelyn StewartJane A. BuxtonTravis SalwayMark GilbertOlivier Ferlatte
- Topics
- LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy (3 papers)HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions (3 papers)Health disparities and outcomes (2 papers)
- Journals
- Canadian Medical Association JournalSocial Psychiatry and Psychiatric EpidemiologyThe Canadian Journal of Psychiatry
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited StatesAustralia
In The Last Decade
Naomi Dove
10 papers receiving 739 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 97
- Clinical Psychology 459
- General Health Professions 149
- Social Psychology 130
- Sociology and Political Science 127
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 81
Countries citing papers authored by Naomi Dove
This map shows the geographic impact of Naomi Dove's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Naomi Dove with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Naomi Dove more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Naomi Dove
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Naomi Dove. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Naomi Dove. The network helps show where Naomi Dove may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Naomi Dove
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Naomi Dove. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Naomi Dove based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Naomi Dove. Naomi Dove is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 9 | |
| 4 | 6 | |
| 5 | Review: Mental health impacts of the COVID‐19 pandemic on children and youth – a systematic reviewbreakdown → | 577 |
| 6 | 12 | |
| 7 | 33 | |
| 8 | 38 | |
| 9 | Can international medical graduates help solve Canada's shortage of rural physicians? | 16 |
| 10 | 56 |
About Naomi Dove
Naomi Dove is a scholar working on Toxicology, Social Psychology and Health, having authored 10 papers that have together received 751 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy (3 papers), HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions (3 papers) and Health disparities and outcomes (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (459 citations), Applied Psychology (52 citations) and Health (63 citations). Naomi Dove has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Hasina Samji, David Long, Judy Wu, S. Evelyn Stewart, Jane A. Buxton, Travis Salway, Mark Gilbert, Olivier Ferlatte, Troy Grennan and Jason Wong. Their work appears in journals such as Canadian Medical Association Journal, Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology and The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.