Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Countries citing papers authored by Nancy Scheper‐Hughes
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Nancy Scheper‐Hughes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nancy Scheper‐Hughes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nancy Scheper‐Hughes more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nancy Scheper‐Hughes
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nancy Scheper‐Hughes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nancy Scheper‐Hughes. The network helps show where Nancy Scheper‐Hughes may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nancy Scheper‐Hughes
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nancy Scheper‐Hughes.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nancy Scheper‐Hughes based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Nancy Scheper‐Hughes. Nancy Scheper‐Hughes is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Scheper‐Hughes, Nancy. (2013). No more angel babies on the Alto do Cruzeiro: A dispatch from Brazil's revolution child survival.. Natural history. 121(5). 28–38.1 indexed citations
4.
Scheper‐Hughes, Nancy. (2009). The tyranny and the terror of the gift: Sacrificial violence and the gift of life. Econstor (Econstor). 11(1). 8–16.5 indexed citations
Delmonico, Francis L. & Nancy Scheper‐Hughes. (2002). Why We Should Not Pay for Human Organs. The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly. 2(3). 381–389.9 indexed citations
10.
Scheper‐Hughes, Nancy, et al.. (1998). Truth and Rumor on the Organ Trail.. Natural history. 107(10). 48–55.17 indexed citations
11.
Scheper‐Hughes, Nancy. (1998). Undoing: Social Suffering and the Politics of Remorse in the New South Africa. Social Justice A Journal of Crime Conflict & World Order. 25(4). 114.29 indexed citations
12.
Scheper‐Hughes, Nancy, et al.. (1997). Brazil : Moving Targets.. Natural history. 106(6). 34–43.3 indexed citations
Scheper‐Hughes, Nancy. (1995). Who's the Killer? Popular Justice and Human Rights in a South African Squatter Camp. Social Justice A Journal of Crime Conflict & World Order. 22(3). 143.17 indexed citations
16.
Scheper‐Hughes, Nancy. (1994). An essay:. Social Science & Medicine. 39(7). 991–1003.61 indexed citations
Scheper‐Hughes, Nancy & Margaret Lock. (1991). The message in the bottle illness and the micropolitics of resistance. 18(4). 409–432.34 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.