Naishitha Anaparthy
About
In The Last Decade
Naishitha Anaparthy
6 papers receiving 320 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
- Molecular Biology 168
- Oncology 138
- Cancer Research 83
- Immunology 77
- Cell Biology 60
Countries citing papers authored by Naishitha Anaparthy
This map shows the geographic impact of Naishitha Anaparthy's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Naishitha Anaparthy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Naishitha Anaparthy more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Naishitha Anaparthy
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Naishitha Anaparthy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Naishitha Anaparthy. The network helps show where Naishitha Anaparthy may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Naishitha Anaparthy
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Naishitha Anaparthy. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Naishitha Anaparthy based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Naishitha Anaparthy. Naishitha Anaparthy is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 28 | |
| 3 | 197 | |
| 4 | 59 | |
| 5 | 32 | |
| 6 | 4 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.