Nadine Hollevoet
- Surgery top 5%
- Rehabilitation top 1%
- Orthopedics and Sports Medicine top 5%
- Epidemiology
- Rheumatology top 10%
- Co-authors
- René VerdonkGrey GiddinsKai HuangGeorges Van MaeleL KinnenJean-Pierre MoermansStefan GoemaereJean‐Marc Kaufman
- Topics
- Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation (31 papers)Elbow and Forearm Trauma Treatment (20 papers)Bone fractures and treatments (8 papers)
- Partner nations
- BelgiumSwitzerlandNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Nadine Hollevoet
40 papers receiving 631 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
- Surgery 555
- Rehabilitation 321
- Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 181
- Epidemiology 170
- Rheumatology 83
Countries citing papers authored by Nadine Hollevoet
This map shows the geographic impact of Nadine Hollevoet's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nadine Hollevoet with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nadine Hollevoet more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nadine Hollevoet
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nadine Hollevoet. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nadine Hollevoet. The network helps show where Nadine Hollevoet may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nadine Hollevoet
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nadine Hollevoet. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nadine Hollevoet based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nadine Hollevoet. Nadine Hollevoet is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 4 | |
| 6 | 4 | |
| 7 | 37 | |
| 8 | 6 | |
| 9 | 7 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 9 | |
| 12 | 111 | |
| 13 | Which patients undergo a surgical reintervention following a distal radius fracture? | 1 |
| 14 | 91 | |
| 15 | Percutaneous K-wire fixation versus palmar plating with locking screws for Colles' fractures. | 42 |
| 16 | Effect of patient age on malunion of operatively treated distal radius fractures. | 5 |
| 17 | 6 | |
| 18 | 9 | |
| 19 | Outcome of distal radius fractures in relation to bone mineral density. | 35 |
| 20 | Intramedullary nailing of diaphyseal forearm fractures in adults | 2 |
About Nadine Hollevoet
Nadine Hollevoet is a scholar working on Rehabilitation, Anatomy and Pharmacy, having authored 41 papers that have together received 657 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation (31 papers), Elbow and Forearm Trauma Treatment (20 papers) and Bone fractures and treatments (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Rehabilitation (321 citations), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (181 citations) and Surgery (555 citations). Nadine Hollevoet has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, Switzerland and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include René Verdonk, Grey Giddins, Kai Huang, Georges Van Maele, L Kinnen, Jean-Pierre Moermans, Stefan Goemaere, Jean‐Marc Kaufman, J.-P. Devogelaer and Koen Milisen. Their work appears in journals such as Osteoporosis International, Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery and PeerJ.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.