Nadia Sitas

2.9k total citations
36 papers, 1.1k citations indexed

About

Nadia Sitas is a scholar working on Global and Planetary Change, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law and Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis. According to data from OpenAlex, Nadia Sitas has authored 36 papers receiving a total of 1.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 28 papers in Global and Planetary Change, 6 papers in Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law and 5 papers in Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis. Recurrent topics in Nadia Sitas's work include Land Use and Ecosystem Services (16 papers), Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (12 papers) and Sustainability and Climate Change Governance (12 papers). Nadia Sitas is often cited by papers focused on Land Use and Ecosystem Services (16 papers), Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (12 papers) and Sustainability and Climate Change Governance (12 papers). Nadia Sitas collaborates with scholars based in South Africa, Sweden and United Kingdom. Nadia Sitas's co-authors include Belinda Reyers, Karen J. Esler, Patrick O’Farrell, Jeanne Nel, Heidi Prozesky, Jonathan Baillie, Nick J. B. Isaac, Deon Nel, Amanda Jiménez-Aceituno and Laura Pereira and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and Journal of Environmental Management.

In The Last Decade

Nadia Sitas

34 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
Nadia Sitas 642 224 169 163 130 36 1.1k
Ulrich Heink 605 0.9× 221 1.0× 136 0.8× 215 1.3× 90 0.7× 14 1.1k
Stephen Woroniecki 569 0.9× 186 0.8× 223 1.3× 131 0.8× 125 1.0× 12 985
Gretchen Walters 746 1.2× 237 1.1× 146 0.9× 210 1.3× 136 1.0× 43 1.2k
Noelia Zafra‐Calvo 545 0.8× 216 1.0× 121 0.7× 251 1.5× 76 0.6× 29 933
Jonathan R. B. Fisher 443 0.7× 167 0.7× 119 0.7× 266 1.6× 124 1.0× 25 992
Stewart Maginnis 825 1.3× 215 1.0× 99 0.6× 239 1.5× 125 1.0× 40 1.2k
Shilpi Srivastava 496 0.8× 189 0.8× 289 1.7× 147 0.9× 135 1.0× 29 1.1k
Chloe B. Wardropper 461 0.7× 169 0.8× 121 0.7× 156 1.0× 65 0.5× 55 993
Rebecca M. Ford 573 0.9× 200 0.9× 271 1.6× 148 0.9× 138 1.1× 41 1.0k
Martin Welp 591 0.9× 148 0.7× 156 0.9× 121 0.7× 99 0.8× 38 966

Countries citing papers authored by Nadia Sitas

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nadia Sitas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nadia Sitas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nadia Sitas more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nadia Sitas

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nadia Sitas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nadia Sitas. The network helps show where Nadia Sitas may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nadia Sitas

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nadia Sitas. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nadia Sitas based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nadia Sitas. Nadia Sitas is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Selomane, Odirilwe, et al.. (2025). Public finance allocation does not reflect biodiversity priorities. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 74. 101524–101524. 1 indexed citations
2.
Harmáčková, Zuzana V., Klaus Eisenack, Yuki Yoshida, et al.. (2025). Value archetypes in future scenarios: the role of scenario co-designers. Ecology and Society. 30(3). 1 indexed citations
3.
Yoshida, Yuki, Nadia Sitas, Lelani Mannetti, et al.. (2024). Beyond Academia: A case for reviews of gray literature for science-policy processes and applied research. Environmental Science & Policy. 162. 103882–103882. 10 indexed citations
5.
Cockburn, Jessica, et al.. (2024). Shedding light on global south transformations: integration, transgression, diversity and hope. Ecosystems and People. 20(1).
6.
Sitas, Nadia, et al.. (2024). Community perceptions on land and water acquisitions in the Okavango Delta: implications for rural livelihoods. Ecosystems and People. 20(1). 1 indexed citations
7.
Biggs, Reinette, et al.. (2024). Comparing apples and pears: Linking capitals and capacities to assess the resilience of commercial farming operations. Agricultural Systems. 217. 103934–103934. 2 indexed citations
8.
Sitas, Nadia, et al.. (2023). Inclusion of ecosystem services in the management of municipal natural open space systems. People and Nature. 6(1). 301–320. 4 indexed citations
9.
Harmáčková, Zuzana V., Yuki Yoshida, Nadia Sitas, et al.. (2023). The role of values in future scenarios: what types of values underpin (un)sustainable and (un)just futures?. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 64. 101343–101343. 15 indexed citations
10.
Shackleton, Sheona, Anna Taylor, Lindsey Gillson, et al.. (2023). Fostering transdisciplinary research for equitable and sustainable development pathways across Africa: what changes are needed?. Ecosystems and People. 19(1). 14 indexed citations
12.
Pereira, Laura, Ghassem Asrar, Angel Hsu, et al.. (2021). Grounding global environmental assessments through bottom-up futures based on local practices and perspectives. Sustainability Science. 16(6). 1907–1922. 32 indexed citations
13.
Pereira, Laura, Angel Hsu, Jeanne Nel, et al.. (2019). Bottom-up Initiatives and Participatory Approaches for Outlooks. City Research Online (City University London). 1 indexed citations
14.
Sitas, Nadia, et al.. (2019). Exploring integrative research in the context of invasive alien plant management. South African Journal of Science. 115(3/4). 5 indexed citations
15.
Pereira, Laura, Nadia Sitas, Federica Ravera, Amanda Jiménez-Aceituno, & Andrew Merrie. (2019). Building capacities for transformative change towards sustainability: Imagination in Intergovernmental Science-Policy Scenario Processes. Elementa Science of the Anthropocene. 7. 72 indexed citations
16.
Balbi, Stefano, Odirilwe Selomane, Nadia Sitas, et al.. (2019). Human dependence on natural resources in rapidly urbanising South African regions. Environmental Research Letters. 14(4). 44008–44008. 26 indexed citations
17.
Sitas, Nadia, et al.. (2018). Exploring the dynamics of research collaborations by mapping social networks in invasion science. Journal of Environmental Management. 229. 27–37. 46 indexed citations
18.
Peterson, Garry, Zuzana V. Harmáčková, Megan Meacham, et al.. (2018). Welcoming different perspectives in IPBES: “Nature’s contributions to people” and “Ecosystem services”. Ecology and Society. 23(1). 104 indexed citations
19.
Forsyth, Greg G., et al.. (2015). Two decades of managing invasive alien plants : exploring Working for Water success stories : natural environment. 8(2). 100–101. 1 indexed citations
20.
Sitas, Nadia, Heidi Prozesky, Karen J. Esler, & Belinda Reyers. (2014). Exploring the Gap between Ecosystem Service Research and Management in Development Planning. Sustainability. 6(6). 3802–3824. 54 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026