Nadia Minicuci
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine top 10%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 5%
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Toxicology top 1%
- Co-authors
- Somnath ChatterjiPeter Lloyd‐SherlockS EbrahimJohn BeardGiovanni ForzaLucia Di FuriaFabrizio SchifanoStefania Maggi
- Topics
- Global Health Care Issues (2 papers)Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (2 papers)Health disparities and outcomes (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- ItalySwitzerlandUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Nadia Minicuci
20 papers receiving 1.2k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 107
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 254
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 171
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 155
- Clinical Psychology 152
- Toxicology 152
Countries citing papers authored by Nadia Minicuci
This map shows the geographic impact of Nadia Minicuci's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nadia Minicuci with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nadia Minicuci more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nadia Minicuci
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nadia Minicuci. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nadia Minicuci. The network helps show where Nadia Minicuci may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nadia Minicuci
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nadia Minicuci. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nadia Minicuci based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nadia Minicuci. Nadia Minicuci is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 23 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 7 | |
| 4 | Hypertension among older adults in low- and middle-income countries: prevalence, awareness and controlbreakdown → | 367 |
| 5 | 7 | |
| 6 | 13 | |
| 7 | 9 | |
| 8 | 37 | |
| 9 | 10 | |
| 10 | 31 | |
| 11 | 36 | |
| 12 | 35 | |
| 13 | 48 | |
| 14 | 34 | |
| 15 | Teaching and training programme on carbohydrate counting in Type 1 diabetic patients. | 16 |
| 16 | 60 | |
| 17 | 189 | |
| 18 | 179 | |
| 19 | 9 | |
| 20 | 83 |
About Nadia Minicuci
Nadia Minicuci is a scholar working on Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Toxicology and Geriatrics and Gerontology, having authored 20 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Global Health Care Issues (2 papers), Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (2 papers) and Health disparities and outcomes (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Toxicology (152 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (171 citations) and Geriatrics and Gerontology (45 citations). Nadia Minicuci has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, Switzerland and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Somnath Chatterji, Peter Lloyd‐Sherlock, S Ebrahim, John Beard, Giovanni Forza, Lucia Di Furia, Fabrizio Schifano, Stefania Maggi, Giuliano Enzi and Daniel J. Foley. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society and European Respiratory Journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.