Nadia Kaiserman
Impact in
- Ophthalmology top 2%
- Glaucoma and retinal disorders
- Retinal Diseases and Treatments
- Ocular Infections and Treatments
- Ocular Oncology and Treatments
- Clinical Biochemistry top 10%
- Advanced Glycation End Products research
Papers in
-
- Glaucoma and retinal disorders 4
- Retinal and Optic Conditions 3
- Retinal Diseases and Treatments 3
- Ocular Oncology and Treatments 3
- Co-authors
- Igor KaisermanShlomo VinkerSasson NakarAsher ElhayanyJ. Pe’erShahar FrenkelKaren HendlerJacob Pe’er
- Journals
- Ophthalmology (3 papers)Current Eye Research (3 papers)American Journal of Ophthalmology (2 papers)British Journal of Ophthalmology (1 paper)Journal of Glaucoma (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- IsraelUnited States
In The Last Decade
Nadia Kaiserman
13 papers receiving 354 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
- Ophthalmology 260
- Clinical Biochemistry 46
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 126
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 153
- Immunology and Allergy 23
Countries citing papers authored by Nadia Kaiserman
This map shows the geographic impact of Nadia Kaiserman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nadia Kaiserman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nadia Kaiserman more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nadia Kaiserman
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nadia Kaiserman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nadia Kaiserman. The network helps show where Nadia Kaiserman may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 9 scholars most cited alongside Nadia Kaiserman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Do We Need Margins Around the Tumor Base During Ru-106 Brachytherapy for Posterior Uveal Melanoma? | 2010 | 1 |
| 2 | 2009 | 37 | |
| 3 | 2009 | 20 | |
| 4 | 2007 | 28 | |
| 5 | 2007 | 31 | |
| 6 | 2006 | 28 | |
| 7 | 2006 | 3 | |
| 8 | 2006 | 4 | |
| 9 | 2005 | 158 | |
| 10 | 2005 | 7 | |
| 11 | 2005 | 19 | |
| 12 | 2005 | 32 | |
| 13 | 2005 | 3 |
About Nadia Kaiserman
Nadia Kaiserman is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Behavioral Neuroscience, Clinical Biochemistry, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, having authored 13 papers that have together received 371 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ocular Surface and Contact Lens (4 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (4 papers), Retinal Imaging and Analysis (3 papers), Retinal and Optic Conditions (3 papers), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (3 papers), Ocular Oncology and Treatments (3 papers), Retinal Development and Disorders (2 papers) and Herpesvirus Infections and Treatments (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (260 citations), Clinical Biochemistry (46 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (126 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (153 citations) and Immunology and Allergy (23 citations). Nadia Kaiserman has collaborated with scholars based in Israel and United States. Frequent co-authors include Igor Kaiserman, Shlomo Vinker, Sasson Nakar, Asher Elhayany, J. Pe’er, Shahar Frenkel, Karen Hendler, Jacob Pe’er and Radgonde Amer. Their work appears in journals such as Ophthalmology, Current Eye Research, American Journal of Ophthalmology, British Journal of Ophthalmology and Journal of Glaucoma.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.