Nadia Innaro

859 citations
23 papers · 297 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Nadia Innaro

20 papers receiving 283 citations

Peers

Nadia Innaro
Comparison fields: 5 of 42
  • Nephrology 40
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 86
  • Surgery 192
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 17
  • Reproductive Medicine 26
Replace Jakob Hinrichs with:
Jakob Hinrichs Germany
Nihat Aksakal Türkiye
Alberto Tatti Italy
Simona Gili Italy
J S H Wade United Kingdom
Patsy Crummer Australia
Lorenzo Fregoli Italy
Noah Sands Canada
Gianluca Frustaci Italy
Luca Gordini Italy
Nadia Innaro relative to Jakob Hinrichs Germany Jakob Hinrichs's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Jakob Hinrichs · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nadia Innaro

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nadia Innaro's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nadia Innaro with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nadia Innaro more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nadia Innaro

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nadia Innaro. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nadia Innaro. The network helps show where Nadia Innaro may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nadia Innaro, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nadia Innaro Line = papers co-authored together Nadia Innaro links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2014126
2 201550
3 200142
4 201913
5 202010
6 201310
7 20118
8
[Preoperative diagnosis of incidental carcinoma in multinodular goitre by means of electromagnetic interactions].
20076
9
[Thyroid microcarcinoma and multinodular struma. Personal experience and considerations regarding surgical therapy].
20066
10 20195
11 20215
12 20224
13
[Thyroidectomy using the intra-operative neuromonitoring and the surgeon's confidence].
20123
14 20202
15 20182
16 20241
17 19971
18 20151
19 20201
20 20221

About Nadia Innaro

Nadia Innaro is a scholar working on Surgery, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Nephrology, Oncology and Genetics, having authored 23 papers that have together received 297 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Thyroid Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (11 papers), Thyroid and Parathyroid Surgery (11 papers), Parathyroid Disorders and Treatments (3 papers), Head and Neck Anomalies (2 papers), Soft tissue tumors and treatment (1 paper), Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (1 paper), Genetic Syndromes and Imprinting (1 paper) and BRCA gene mutations in cancer (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Nephrology (40 citations), Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (86 citations), Surgery (192 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (17 citations) and Reproductive Medicine (26 citations). Nadia Innaro has collaborated with scholars based in Italy and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Giulio Orlando, Alessandro Puzziello, L Rosato, Nicola Avenia, Maurizio De Palma, Pietro Giorgio Calò, Rita Gervasi, Rosario Sacco, Mario Vitale and Rodolfo Sacco. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Voice, BMC Surgery, Diagnostic Pathology, European Journal of Surgical Oncology and Journal of Pediatric Surgery.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact