Nadia Gopichandran
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 5%
- Molecular Biology
- Immunology
- Reproductive Medicine top 5%
- Obstetrics and Gynecology top 5%
- Co-authors
- Nicolas M. OrsiHenry J. LeeseJames J. WalkerSarah E. HarrisHelen M. PictonUma V. EkboteH. J. LeeseMalcolm I. Levene
- Topics
- Reproductive System and Pregnancy (7 papers)Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies (4 papers)Reproductive Biology and Fertility (4 papers)
- Cited by
- Reproductive MedicineObstetrics and GynecologyPublic Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
- Journals
- PLoS ONEReproductionTheriogenology
- Partner nations
- United KingdomIndiaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Nadia Gopichandran
13 papers receiving 670 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 405
- Molecular Biology 197
- Immunology 185
- Reproductive Medicine 178
- Obstetrics and Gynecology 116
Countries citing papers authored by Nadia Gopichandran
This map shows the geographic impact of Nadia Gopichandran's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nadia Gopichandran with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nadia Gopichandran more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nadia Gopichandran
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nadia Gopichandran. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nadia Gopichandran. The network helps show where Nadia Gopichandran may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nadia Gopichandran
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nadia Gopichandran. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nadia Gopichandran based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nadia Gopichandran. Nadia Gopichandran is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | |
| 2 | 22 | |
| 3 | 54 | |
| 4 | 5 | |
| 5 | 81 | |
| 6 | 14 | |
| 7 | 19 | |
| 8 | 39 | |
| 9 | 46 | |
| 10 | 99 | |
| 11 | 165 | |
| 12 | 74 | |
| 13 | 59 |
About Nadia Gopichandran
Nadia Gopichandran is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, Agronomy and Crop Science and Reproductive Medicine, having authored 13 papers that have together received 681 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reproductive System and Pregnancy (7 papers), Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies (4 papers) and Reproductive Biology and Fertility (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (178 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (116 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (405 citations). Nadia Gopichandran has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, India and United States. Frequent co-authors include Nicolas M. Orsi, Henry J. Leese, James J. Walker, Sarah E. Harris, Helen M. Picton, Uma V. Ekbote, H. J. Leese, Malcolm I. Levene, Julia Cockle and Philip McShane. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Reproduction and Theriogenology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.