Nadia Alam

1.7k total citations · 1 hit paper
18 papers, 762 citations indexed

About

Nadia Alam is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Emergency Medicine and General Health Professions. According to data from OpenAlex, Nadia Alam has authored 18 papers receiving a total of 762 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 13 papers in Epidemiology, 6 papers in Emergency Medicine and 5 papers in General Health Professions. Recurrent topics in Nadia Alam's work include Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment (11 papers), Emergency and Acute Care Studies (5 papers) and Trauma and Emergency Care Studies (4 papers). Nadia Alam is often cited by papers focused on Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment (11 papers), Emergency and Acute Care Studies (5 papers) and Trauma and Emergency Care Studies (4 papers). Nadia Alam collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, Canada and United Kingdom. Nadia Alam's co-authors include Prabath W.B. Nanayakkara, Elise P. Jansma, Peter M. van de Ven, Arne J. van Tienhoven, Rishi Panday, Mark H.H. Kramer, Edith N. G. Houben, Louella Vaughan, Steven Wang and T. A. M. Hekker and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, CHEST Journal and Critical Care.

In The Last Decade

Nadia Alam

17 papers receiving 747 citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

The impact of the use of the Early Warning Score (EWS) on patient outcomes: A systematic review

2014 298 citations Nadia Alam, Arne J. van Tienhoven et al. Resuscitation profile →

Peers

Countries citing papers authored by Nadia Alam

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nadia Alam's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nadia Alam with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nadia Alam more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nadia Alam

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nadia Alam. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nadia Alam. The network helps show where Nadia Alam may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nadia Alam

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nadia Alam. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nadia Alam based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nadia Alam. Nadia Alam is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

18 of 18 papers shown

#	Work	Indexed citations
1	Family physicians collaborating for health system integration: a scoping review 2023 ·BMC Health Services Research ·(unknown), (unknown), (unknown), (unknown), Nadia Alam	5
2	Adapting Our SCOPE: Lessons Learned from Spreading and Scaling Efforts to Integrate Care 2023 ·Healthcare Quarterly ·(unknown), (unknown), Celia Laur, Noah Ivers, (unknown), (unknown), (unknown), Nadia Alam, (unknown)	0
3	The importance of information, motivation, and behavioral skills (IMB): Healthcare provider perspectives on improving adherence to cervical cancer screening among at-risk women 2021 ·Public Health in Practice ·Anjanette Wells, (unknown), Nadia Alam, (unknown), Amanda Jackson, Thomas J. Herzog	4
4	Towards Understanding the Effective Use of Antibiotics for Sepsis 2021 ·CHEST Journal ·Michiel Schinkel, Ketan Paranjape, (unknown), Rishi Panday, Nadia Alam, Prabath W.B. Nanayakkara	9
5	Putting the Patient First: A Scoping Review of Patient Desires in Canada 2021 ·Healthcare policy ·Allie Peckham, James G. Wright, Husayn Marani, (unknown), (unknown), Sara Allin, Nadia Alam, Gregory P. Marchildon	3
6	Septic patients with cancer: Do prehospital antibiotics improve survival? A sub-analysis of the PHANTASi trial. 2020 ·PubMed ·Rishi Panday, Steven Wang, (unknown), Tim Cooksley, Nadia Alam, Prabath W.B. Nanayakkara	1
7	Evaluation of blood culture epidemiology and efficiency in a large European teaching hospital 2019 ·PLoS ONE ·Rishi Panday, Steven Wang, Peter M. van de Ven, T. A. M. Hekker, Nadia Alam, Prabath W.B. Nanayakkara	57
8	An overview of positive cultures and clinical outcomes in septic patients: a sub-analysis of the Prehospital Antibiotics Against Sepsis (PHANTASi) trial 2019 ·Critical Care ·Rishi Panday, (unknown), Nadia Alam, Prabath W.B. Nanayakkara	44
9	Health related quality of life in sepsis survivors from the Prehospital Antibiotics Against Sepsis (PHANTASi) trial 2019 ·PLoS ONE ·Rishi Panday, (unknown), (unknown), Nadia Alam, Prabath W.B. Nanayakkara	11
10	Prognostic value of early warning scores in the emergency department (ED) and acute medical unit (AMU): A narrative review 2017 ·European Journal of Internal Medicine ·Rishi Panday, (unknown), Nadia Alam, Prabath W.B. Nanayakkara	90
11	Long-term health related quality of life in patients with sepsis after intensive care stay: A systematic review 2017 ·Acute Medicine Journal ·Nadia Alam, Rishi Panday, (unknown), Louise S. van Galen, Mark H.H. Kramer, Prabath W.B. Nanayakkara	13
12	Acute medical units: The way to go? A literature review 2016 ·European Journal of Internal Medicine ·Louise S. van Galen, (unknown), Linda Schoonmade, Nadia Alam, Mark H.H. Kramer, Prabath W.B. Nanayakkara	24
13	Epidemiology, recognition and documentation of sepsis in the pre-hospital setting and associated clinical outcomes: a prospective multicenter study 2016 ·Acute Medicine Journal ·Nadia Alam, (unknown), (unknown), (unknown), F. Holleman, Mark H.H. Kramer, Prabath W.B. Nanayakkara	11
14	Study protocol for a Multi-centre, Investigator-initiated, Randomized Controlled Trial to Compare the Effects of Prehospital Antibiotic Treatment for Sepsis Patients with Usual Care after Training Emergency Medical Services (EMS) Personnel in Early Recognition (– The Prehospital ANTibiotics Against Sepsis (PHANTASi) trial 2016 ·Acute Medicine Journal ·Nadia Alam, Peter M. van de Ven, Erick Oskam, Patricia M. Stassen, Mark H.H. Kramer, Pieternel van Exter, Prabath W.B. Nanayakkara, (unknown)	6
15	Exploring the performance of the National Early Warning Score (NEWS) in a European emergency department 2015 ·Resuscitation ·Nadia Alam, (unknown), Edith N. G. Houben, (unknown), Louella Vaughan, Mark H.H. Kramer, Prabath W.B. Nanayakkara	129
16	Epidemiology of Sepsis and Its Recognition by Emergency Medical Services Personnel in the Netherlands 2015 ·Prehospital Emergency Care ·(unknown), Nadia Alam, F. Holleman, Pieternel van Exter, Mark H.H. Kramer, Prabath W.B. Nanayakkara	32
17	What are we waiting for? Factors influencing completion times in an academic and peripheral emergency department. 2015 ·PubMed ·(unknown), Nadia Alam, (unknown), Oualid Jouini, (unknown), (unknown), (unknown), (unknown), P. M. N. Y. H. Go, Mark H.H. Kramer, Ger Koole, Prabath W.B. Nanayakkara	25
18	The impact of the use of the Early Warning Score (EWS) on patient outcomes: A systematic review breakdown → 2014 ·Resuscitation ·Nadia Alam, (unknown), Arne J. van Tienhoven, Peter M. van de Ven, Elise P. Jansma, Prabath W.B. Nanayakkara	298

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact