Nadia Aïssaoui
- Biomedical Engineering top 5%
- Surgery top 5%
- Emergency Medicine top 0.5%
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine top 5%
- Epidemiology
- Co-authors
- Alain CombesBenoı̂t DiéboldPascal LeprinceAly El‐BanayosyJean ChastrePhilippe LégerJan GummertMichiel Morshuis
- Topics
- Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices (40 papers)Cardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair (30 papers)Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (28 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaJournal of the American College of CardiologyScientific Reports
- Partner nations
- FranceGermanyUnited States
In The Last Decade
Nadia Aïssaoui
60 papers receiving 1.3k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
- Biomedical Engineering 925
- Surgery 826
- Emergency Medicine 684
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 490
- Epidemiology 130
Countries citing papers authored by Nadia Aïssaoui
This map shows the geographic impact of Nadia Aïssaoui's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nadia Aïssaoui with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nadia Aïssaoui more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nadia Aïssaoui
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nadia Aïssaoui. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nadia Aïssaoui. The network helps show where Nadia Aïssaoui may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nadia Aïssaoui
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nadia Aïssaoui. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nadia Aïssaoui based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nadia Aïssaoui. Nadia Aïssaoui is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 22 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 20 | |
| 4 | 34 | |
| 5 | 26 | |
| 6 | 48 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 26 | |
| 9 | 13 | |
| 10 | 39 | |
| 11 | 6 | |
| 12 | 32 | |
| 13 | 100 | |
| 14 | 19 | |
| 15 | 70 | |
| 16 | 36 | |
| 17 | 2 | |
| 18 | 8 | |
| 19 | 2 | |
| 20 | 18 |
About Nadia Aïssaoui
Nadia Aïssaoui is a scholar working on Emergency Medicine, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and Internal Medicine, having authored 65 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices (40 papers), Cardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair (30 papers) and Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (28 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Emergency Medicine (684 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (490 citations) and Biomedical Engineering (925 citations). Nadia Aïssaoui has collaborated with scholars based in France, Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include Alain Combes, Benoı̂t Diébold, Pascal Leprince, Aly El‐Banayosy, Jean Chastre, Philippe Léger, Jan Gummert, Michiel Morshuis, Étienne Puymirat and Charles‐Édouard Luyt. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Journal of the American College of Cardiology and Scientific Reports.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.