Nabil Hasshim
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 10%
- Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition top 10%
- Developmental and Educational Psychology
- Social Psychology
- Co-authors
- Benjamin A. ParrisMaria AugustinovaLudovic FerrandSarah BateRachel J. BennettsEbony MurrayCharlie D. FrowdEmma Portch
- Topics
- Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (13 papers)Visual perception and processing mechanisms (4 papers)Face Recognition and Perception (3 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & PerformanceEuropean Journal of NeuroscienceJournal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition
- Partner nations
- United KingdomFranceIreland
In The Last Decade
Nabil Hasshim
17 papers receiving 344 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 50
- Cognitive Neuroscience 310
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 131
- Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 66
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 47
- Social Psychology 46
Countries citing papers authored by Nabil Hasshim
This map shows the geographic impact of Nabil Hasshim's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nabil Hasshim with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nabil Hasshim more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nabil Hasshim
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nabil Hasshim. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nabil Hasshim. The network helps show where Nabil Hasshim may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nabil Hasshim
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nabil Hasshim. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nabil Hasshim based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nabil Hasshim. Nabil Hasshim is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 10 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 9 | |
| 8 | 18 | |
| 9 | 58 | |
| 10 | 14 | |
| 11 | 3 | |
| 12 | 30 | |
| 13 | 20 | |
| 14 | 9 | |
| 15 | 55 | |
| 16 | 36 | |
| 17 | 12 | |
| 18 | 39 | |
| 19 | 26 |
About Nabil Hasshim
Nabil Hasshim is a scholar working on General Decision Sciences, Cognitive Neuroscience and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 19 papers that have together received 345 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (13 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (4 papers) and Face Recognition and Perception (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (35 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (310 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (131 citations). Nabil Hasshim has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, France and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Benjamin A. Parris, Maria Augustinova, Ludovic Ferrand, Sarah Bate, Rachel J. Bennetts, Ebony Murray, Charlie D. Frowd, Emma Portch, Anna K. Bobak and Edwin Burns. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance, European Journal of Neuroscience and Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.