Nabil Hachem

1.3k total citations · 1 hit paper
11 papers, 755 citations indexed

About

Nabil Hachem is a scholar working on Computer Networks and Communications, Signal Processing and Information Systems. According to data from OpenAlex, Nabil Hachem has authored 11 papers receiving a total of 755 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Computer Networks and Communications, 7 papers in Signal Processing and 4 papers in Information Systems. Recurrent topics in Nabil Hachem's work include Advanced Database Systems and Queries (7 papers), Data Management and Algorithms (6 papers) and Distributed systems and fault tolerance (2 papers). Nabil Hachem is often cited by papers focused on Advanced Database Systems and Queries (7 papers), Data Management and Algorithms (6 papers) and Distributed systems and fault tolerance (2 papers). Nabil Hachem collaborates with scholars based in United States, Finland and France. Nabil Hachem's co-authors include Samuel Madden, Daniel J. Abadi, Michael Stonebraker, Stavros Harizopoulos, Pat Helland, Mitch Cherniack, Tingjian Ge, Jennie Rogers, Chuck Bear and Elke A. Rundensteiner and has published in prestigious journals such as International Journal of Electronic Security and Digital Forensics, Very Large Data Bases and Conference on Innovative Data Systems Research.

In The Last Decade

Nabil Hachem

11 papers receiving 672 citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

The end of an architectural era: (it's time for a complete rewrite)

2007 379 citations Michael Stonebraker, Samuel Madden et al. Very Large Data Bases profile →

Peers

Nabil Hachem

CNC

IS

SP

AI

HA

Christof Bornhövd Germany

Sang Kyun South Korea

Nga Tran United States

Frances Perry United States

Andrey Gubarev United States

Angelika Reiser Germany

Konstantinos Karanasos United States

Ramana Yerneni United States

Jennie Duggan United States

D Mills United States

Christof Bornhövd Germany

Nabil Hachem

517 ×0.8

CNC

280 ×0.7

IS

131 ×0.8

SP

130 ×1.1

AI

73 ×0.9

HA

Citations per year, relative to Nabil Hachem Nabil Hachem (= 1×) peers Christof Bornhövd

Countries citing papers authored by Nabil Hachem

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nabil Hachem's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nabil Hachem with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nabil Hachem more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nabil Hachem

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nabil Hachem. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nabil Hachem. The network helps show where Nabil Hachem may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nabil Hachem

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nabil Hachem. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nabil Hachem based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nabil Hachem. Nabil Hachem is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

11 of 11 papers shown

1.

Hachem, Nabil, et al.. (2012). An Ontology-Based Model for SIEM Environments. 5 indexed citations

2.

Hachem, Nabil, et al.. (2012). An ontology-driven approach to model SIEM information and operations using the SWRL formalism. International Journal of Electronic Security and Digital Forensics. 4(2/3). 104–104. 8 indexed citations

3.

Abadi, Daniel J., Samuel Madden, & Nabil Hachem. (2008). Column-stores vs. row-stores. 967–980. 271 indexed citations

4.

Stonebraker, Michael, Chuck Bear, Uğur Çetintemel, et al.. (2007). One Size Fits All? Part 2: Benchmarking Studies.. Conference on Innovative Data Systems Research. 173–184. 32 indexed citations

5.

Stonebraker, Michael, Samuel Madden, Daniel J. Abadi, et al.. (2007). The end of an architectural era: (it's time for a complete rewrite). Very Large Data Bases. 1150–1160. 379 indexed citations breakdown →

6.

Stonebraker, Michael, Chuck Bear, Mitch Cherniack, et al.. (2007). One Size Fits All? - Part 2: Benchmarking Results. 173–184. 24 indexed citations

7.

Rundensteiner, Elke A., et al.. (1998). Integrating the rewriting and ranking phases of view synchronization. 60–65. 15 indexed citations

8.

Hachem, Nabil, et al.. (1993). Managing Derived Data in the Gaea Scientific DBMS. Digital WPI. 1–12. 12 indexed citations

9.

Hachem, Nabil, Michael A. Gennert, & Matthew O. Ward. (1993). A DBMS architecture for global change research. AIP conference proceedings. 283. 121–132. 4 indexed citations

10.

Hachem, Nabil, et al.. (1992). Providing temporal support in data base management systems for global change research. Digital WPI. 274–289. 3 indexed citations

11.

Hachem, Nabil. (1988). Dynamic key-ordered file structures for the random and sequential access to very large data/knowledge bases. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact