Na Jin

634 citations
38 papers · 398 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Na Jin

36 papers receiving 384 citations

Peers

Na Jin
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 273
  • Philosophy 50
  • Biological Psychiatry 11
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 79
  • Pharmacology 55
Replace Maud Beillat with:
Maud Beillat France
Jan Bogers Netherlands
İrem Yaluğ Türkiye
Anja Glockmann Germany
David Healy Ireland
Kyoko Higashi Japan
Adam Trenton United States
Sarz Maxwell United States
Marc Brodsky United States
D. R. C. Willcox United Kingdom
Na Jin relative to Maud Beillat France Maud Beillat's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.1×
Maud Beillat · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Na Jin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Na Jin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Na Jin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Na Jin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Na Jin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Na Jin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Na Jin. The network helps show where Na Jin may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Na Jin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Na Jin Line = papers co-authored together Na Jin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 38 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2014120
2 201348
3 201728
4 201327
5 200922
6 201721
7 202317
8 202413
9 202110
10 201810
11 20179
12 20228
13 20228
14 20207
15 20227
16 20236
17 20216
18 20064
19 20253
20 20233

About Na Jin

Na Jin is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Economics and Econometrics and Infectious Diseases, having authored 38 papers that have together received 398 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Schizophrenia research and treatment (16 papers), Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (8 papers), Pharmaceutical studies and practices (6 papers), Mosquito-borne diseases and control (5 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (5 papers), Viral Infections and Vectors (4 papers), Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies (3 papers) and Gastrointestinal motility and disorders (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (273 citations), Philosophy (50 citations), Biological Psychiatry (11 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (79 citations) and Pharmacology (55 citations). Na Jin has collaborated with scholars based in China, United States and Denmark. Frequent co-authors include Robert D. McQuade, William H. Carson, Ross A. Baker, B. Johnson, Raymond Sanchez, Timothy Peters-Strickland, John M. Kane, Anna Eramo, W. Wolfgang Fleischhacker and Pamela Perry. Their work appears in journals such as European Neuropsychopharmacology, Schizophrenia Research, Frontiers in Psychiatry, Acta Tropica and Value in Health.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact