N. V. Sobolev
- Geophysics top 0.2%
- Artificial Intelligence top 2%
- Materials Chemistry top 10%
- Geochemistry and Petrology top 1%
- Geology top 2%
- Co-authors
- V. S. ShatskyL. A. TaylorA. M. LogvinovaN. P. PokhilenkoА. В. СоболевF. R. BoydG. A. SnyderMaya Kamenetsky
- Topics
- Geological and Geochemical Analysis (91 papers)High-pressure geophysics and materials (72 papers)earthquake and tectonic studies (30 papers)
- Partner nations
- RussiaUnited StatesGermany
In The Last Decade
N. V. Sobolev
97 papers receiving 5.3k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
- Geophysics 5.2k
- Artificial Intelligence 826
- Materials Chemistry 734
- Geochemistry and Petrology 373
- Geology 255
Countries citing papers authored by N. V. Sobolev
This map shows the geographic impact of N. V. Sobolev's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by N. V. Sobolev with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites N. V. Sobolev more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by N. V. Sobolev
This network shows the impact of papers produced by N. V. Sobolev. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by N. V. Sobolev. The network helps show where N. V. Sobolev may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of N. V. Sobolev
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of N. V. Sobolev. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of N. V. Sobolev based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with N. V. Sobolev. N. V. Sobolev is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 7 | |
| 3 | 12 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 20 | |
| 6 | 24 | |
| 7 | 46 | |
| 8 | 3 | |
| 9 | 71 | |
| 10 | Fluid/melt inclusions in alluvial Northeast Siberian diamonds: new approach on diamond formation. | 1 |
| 11 | 11 | |
| 12 | 105 | |
| 13 | 0 | |
| 14 | 15 | |
| 15 | 31 | |
| 16 | 85 | |
| 17 | 152 | |
| 18 | 366 | |
| 19 | Diamond inclusions in garnets from metamorphic rocks: a new environment for diamond formationbreakdown → | 677 |
| 20 | Inclusions of liquified gases in diamond crystals | 2 |
About N. V. Sobolev
N. V. Sobolev is a scholar working on Geophysics, Geochemistry and Petrology and Geology, having authored 108 papers that have together received 5.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Geological and Geochemical Analysis (91 papers), High-pressure geophysics and materials (72 papers) and earthquake and tectonic studies (30 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geophysics (5.2k citations), Geochemistry and Petrology (373 citations) and Geology (255 citations). N. V. Sobolev has collaborated with scholars based in Russia, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include V. S. Shatsky, L. A. Taylor, A. M. Logvinova, N. P. Pokhilenko, А. В. Соболев, F. R. Boyd, G. A. Snyder, Maya Kamenetsky, Vadim S. Kamenetsky and D. A. Zedgenizov. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, Science and Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.