N. Robert Payne
Impact in
- Aquatic Science top 1%
- Fish Biology and Ecology Studies
-
- Fish Ecology and Management Studies
Papers in
-
- Fish Biology and Ecology Studies 6
-
- Fish Ecology and Management Studies 8
- Co-authors
- John M. CasselmanJacqueline McGladePeter E. IhssenFred M. UtterHenry E. BookeMark P. EbenerRandy L. EshenroderJames E. Johnson
- Journals
- Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences (3 papers)Journal of Great Lakes Research (2 papers)Hydrobiologia (1 paper)Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited States
In The Last Decade
N. Robert Payne
9 papers receiving 549 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 46
- Aquatic Science 310
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 505
- Global and Planetary Change 270
- Ecology 258
- Genetics 153
Countries citing papers authored by N. Robert Payne
This map shows the geographic impact of N. Robert Payne's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by N. Robert Payne with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites N. Robert Payne more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by N. Robert Payne
This network shows the impact of papers produced by N. Robert Payne. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by N. Robert Payne. The network helps show where N. Robert Payne may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 24 scholars most cited alongside N. Robert Payne, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Assessing riparian vegetation and creek channel condition in a rapidly chaning urban space: A case study from Blacktown LGA | 2015 | 1 |
| 2 | 1996 | 29 | |
| 3 | 1995 | 118 | |
| 4 | 1995 | 25 | |
| 5 | 1988 | 4 | |
| 6 | 1987 | 41 | |
| 7 | 1981 | 400 | |
| 8 | 1977 | 17 | |
| 9 | 1977 | 58 |
About N. Robert Payne
N. Robert Payne is a scholar working on Aquatic Science, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Global and Planetary Change, Ecology and Water Science and Technology, having authored 9 papers that have together received 693 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Fish Ecology and Management Studies (8 papers), Fish Biology and Ecology Studies (6 papers), Marine and fisheries research (3 papers), Aquatic Invertebrate Ecology and Behavior (2 papers), Genetic diversity and population structure (1 paper), Water Quality and Resources Studies (1 paper), Identification and Quantification in Food (1 paper) and Land Use and Ecosystem Services (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Aquatic Science (310 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (505 citations), Global and Planetary Change (270 citations), Ecology (258 citations) and Genetics (153 citations). N. Robert Payne has collaborated with scholars based in Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include John M. Casselman, Jacqueline McGlade, Peter E. Ihssen, Fred M. Utter, Henry E. Booke, Mark P. Ebener, Randy L. Eshenroder, James E. Johnson, Charles A. Bowen and George R. Spangler. Their work appears in journals such as Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, Journal of Great Lakes Research, Hydrobiologia and Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.