N. Pfleger
Impact in
-
- Photoreceptor and optogenetics research
- Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
- Spectroscopy top 10%
- Advanced NMR Techniques and Applications
Papers in ⓘ
-
- RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms 3
- RNA modifications and cancer 3
- Lipid Membrane Structure and Behavior 2
- Protein Degradation and Inhibitors 1
-
- Photoreceptor and optogenetics research 6
- Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research 5
- Co-authors
- Clemens Glaubitz (6 shared papers)Sarika Shastri (3 shared papers)Andreas C. Woerner (2 shared papers)Ute A. Hellmich (2 shared papers)J. Kempf (6 shared papers)J.M. Egly (4 shared papers)Mark Lorch (2 shared papers)Soraya Hölper (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- FEBS Letters (5 papers)Biophysical Journal (2 papers)Journal of the American Chemical Society (1 paper)Journal of Biomolecular NMR (1 paper)Photochemistry and Photobiology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- GermanyFranceNetherlands
In The Last Decade
N. Pfleger
14 papers receiving 348 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 185
- Spectroscopy 87
- Molecular Biology 218
- Biophysics 11
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 19
Countries citing papers authored by N. Pfleger
This map shows the geographic impact of N. Pfleger's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by N. Pfleger with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites N. Pfleger more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by N. Pfleger
This network shows the impact of papers produced by N. Pfleger. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by N. Pfleger. The network helps show where N. Pfleger may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside N. Pfleger, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2011 | 82 | |
| 2 | 2009 | 46 | |
| 3 | 2010 | 46 | |
| 4 | 2007 | 42 | |
| 5 | 2007 | 36 | |
| 6 | 1972 | 23 | |
| 7 | 1972 | 20 | |
| 8 | 2009 | 20 | |
| 9 | 2015 | 10 | |
| 10 | 2005 | 10 | |
| 11 | 1974 | 10 | |
| 12 | 1978 | 5 | |
| 13 | 1970 | 3 | |
| 14 | 2010 | 1 | |
| 15 | 1972 | 0 |
About N. Pfleger
N. Pfleger is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Spectroscopy, Astronomy and Astrophysics and Infectious Diseases, having authored 15 papers that have together received 354 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Photoreceptor and optogenetics research (6 papers), Advanced NMR Techniques and Applications (5 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (5 papers), RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms (3 papers), RNA modifications and cancer (3 papers), Lipid Membrane Structure and Behavior (2 papers), Origins and Evolution of Life (2 papers) and Protein Degradation and Inhibitors (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (185 citations), Spectroscopy (87 citations), Molecular Biology (218 citations), Biophysics (11 citations) and Astronomy and Astrophysics (19 citations). N. Pfleger has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, France and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Clemens Glaubitz, Sarika Shastri, Andreas C. Woerner, Ute A. Hellmich, J. Kempf, J.M. Egly, Mark Lorch, Soraya Hölper, Josef Wachtveitl and Mirka‐Kristin Verhoefen. Their work appears in journals such as FEBS Letters, Biophysical Journal, Journal of the American Chemical Society, Journal of Biomolecular NMR and Photochemistry and Photobiology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.