N. Kh. Petrov
- Physical and Theoretical Chemistry top 1%
- Organic Chemistry top 10%
- Materials Chemistry
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics top 10%
- Spectroscopy top 5%
- Co-authors
- М. В. АлфимовE. L. FrankevichA. I. ShushinС. П. ГромовH. StaerkTorsten FiebigHubert StaerkSimone Techert
- Topics
- Photochemistry and Electron Transfer Studies (32 papers)Supramolecular Chemistry and Complexes (21 papers)Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (19 papers)
- Journals
- The Journal of Chemical PhysicsSHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaThe Journal of Physical Chemistry
- Partner nations
- RussiaGermanyUnited States
In The Last Decade
N. Kh. Petrov
54 papers receiving 569 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
- Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 347
- Organic Chemistry 273
- Materials Chemistry 258
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 214
- Spectroscopy 168
Countries citing papers authored by N. Kh. Petrov
This map shows the geographic impact of N. Kh. Petrov's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by N. Kh. Petrov with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites N. Kh. Petrov more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by N. Kh. Petrov
This network shows the impact of papers produced by N. Kh. Petrov. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by N. Kh. Petrov. The network helps show where N. Kh. Petrov may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of N. Kh. Petrov
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of N. Kh. Petrov. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of N. Kh. Petrov based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with N. Kh. Petrov. N. Kh. Petrov is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 5 | |
| 6 | 7 | |
| 7 | 3 | |
| 8 | 4 | |
| 9 | 8 | |
| 10 | 13 | |
| 11 | 7 | |
| 12 | 3 | |
| 13 | 17 | |
| 14 | 4 | |
| 15 | 20 | |
| 16 | 21 | |
| 17 | 7 | |
| 18 | 3 | |
| 19 | 1 | |
| 20 | 71 |
About N. Kh. Petrov
N. Kh. Petrov is a scholar working on Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, Spectroscopy and Organic Chemistry, having authored 59 papers that have together received 585 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Photochemistry and Electron Transfer Studies (32 papers), Supramolecular Chemistry and Complexes (21 papers) and Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (19 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (347 citations), Spectroscopy (168 citations) and Organic Chemistry (273 citations). N. Kh. Petrov has collaborated with scholars based in Russia, Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include М. В. Алфимов, E. L. Frankevich, A. I. Shushin, С. П. Громов, H. Staerk, Torsten Fiebig, Hubert Staerk, Simone Techert, G. Busse and A.I. Vedernikov. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Chemical Physics, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and The Journal of Physical Chemistry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.