N. John Cooper

2.4k citations
110 papers · 1.8k · h-index 25

Impact in

Papers in

N. John Cooper

101 papers receiving 1.7k citations

Peers

N. John Cooper
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
  • Process Chemistry and Technology 220
  • Inorganic Chemistry 773
  • Organic Chemistry 1.2k
  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment 241
  • Catalysis 87
Replace Jeffrey C. Bryan with:
Jeffrey C. Bryan United States
Wolfdieter A. Schenk Germany
Hartmut Köpf Germany
M. Freni Italy
Stephan Hohloch Germany
R. B. King United States
Ba L. Tran United States
Κ. Hegetschweiler Germany
Manuela Winter Germany
Steven C. Shoner United States
N. John Cooper relative to Jeffrey C. Bryan United States Jeffrey C. Bryan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Jeffrey C. Bryan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by N. John Cooper

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of N. John Cooper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by N. John Cooper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites N. John Cooper more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by N. John Cooper

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by N. John Cooper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by N. John Cooper. The network helps show where N. John Cooper may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside N. John Cooper, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with N. John Cooper Line = papers co-authored together N. John Cooper links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 110 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 198764
2 199163
3 198953
4 198253
5 198252
6 198151
7 199450
8 198545
9 198041
10 198235
11 198533
12 199131
13 201731
14 198031
15 202129
16 198829
17 197929
18 199229
19 199629
20 199528

About N. John Cooper

N. John Cooper is a scholar working on Organic Chemistry, Inorganic Chemistry, Hematology, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment and Materials Chemistry, having authored 110 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Organometallic Complex Synthesis and Catalysis (39 papers), Asymmetric Hydrogenation and Catalysis (17 papers), Platelet Disorders and Treatments (17 papers), Blood groups and transfusion (15 papers), Inorganic and Organometallic Chemistry (10 papers), Magnetism in coordination complexes (10 papers), Carbon dioxide utilization in catalysis (9 papers) and CO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Process Chemistry and Technology (220 citations), Inorganic Chemistry (773 citations), Organic Chemistry (1.2k citations), Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment (241 citations) and Catalysis (87 citations). N. John Cooper has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Steven J. Geib, Gary R. Lee, Robert L. Thompson, Garry F. Warnock, Malcolm L. H. Green, Sijoon Lee, James R. Fox, John P. McNally, Arnold L. Rheingold and Lawrence K. Fong. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Chemical Society, Organometallics, Inorganic Chemistry, Journal of Organometallic Chemistry and British Journal of Haematology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact