N. Endo

571 total citations
13 papers, 245 citations indexed

About

N. Endo is a scholar working on Computer Networks and Communications, Hardware and Architecture and Computational Theory and Mathematics. According to data from OpenAlex, N. Endo has authored 13 papers receiving a total of 245 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 12 papers in Computer Networks and Communications, 4 papers in Hardware and Architecture and 2 papers in Computational Theory and Mathematics. Recurrent topics in N. Endo's work include Interconnection Networks and Systems (9 papers), Network Traffic and Congestion Control (6 papers) and Parallel Computing and Optimization Techniques (3 papers). N. Endo is often cited by papers focused on Interconnection Networks and Systems (9 papers), Network Traffic and Congestion Control (6 papers) and Parallel Computing and Optimization Techniques (3 papers). N. Endo collaborates with scholars based in Japan. N. Endo's co-authors include T. Kozaki, Y. Sakurai, Hiroshi Kuwahara, Kenichi Asano, Yoshitaka Takahashi, Zhisheng Niu, Mitsuhiro Mori, Yasunari Shidama and Kazuho Miki and has published in prestigious journals such as IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, IEEE Communications Magazine and IEEE Transactions on Communications.

In The Last Decade

N. Endo

9 papers receiving 230 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
N. Endo Japan	7	227	104	99	32	12	13	245
Hussein Badr United States	7	243 1.1×	123 1.2×	25 0.3×	15 0.5×	9 0.8×	21	260
T. Kozaki Japan	5	191 0.8×	82 0.8×	95 1.0×	18 0.6×	12 1.0×	13	196
W.S. Marcus United States	6	280 1.2×	124 1.2×	108 1.1×	7 0.2×	9 0.8×	12	296
Y. Sakurai Japan	4	159 0.7×	78 0.8×	66 0.7×	14 0.4×	10 0.8×	8	161
Shintaro Iwasaki Japan	6	148 0.7×	62 0.6×	95 1.0×	7 0.2×	5 0.4×	15	159
Masahiro Sowa Japan	9	123 0.5×	26 0.3×	142 1.4×	4 0.1×	13 1.1×	42	183
C.A. Johnston United States	7	206 0.9×	165 1.6×	20 0.2×	9 0.3×	5 0.4×	21	240
S. Krishnan United States	7	204 0.9×	159 1.5×	31 0.3×	6 0.2×	4 0.3×	12	208
Wojciech Kabaciński Poland	12	351 1.5×	431 4.1×	55 0.6×	18 0.6×	25 2.1×	73	503
V. Trecordi Italy	9	213 0.9×	176 1.7×	11 0.1×	11 0.3×	2 0.2×	31	241

Countries citing papers authored by N. Endo

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of N. Endo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by N. Endo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites N. Endo more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by N. Endo

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by N. Endo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by N. Endo. The network helps show where N. Endo may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of N. Endo

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of N. Endo. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of N. Endo based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with N. Endo. N. Endo is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

13 of 13 papers shown

1.

Endo, N., et al.. (2006). Continuity of Nakamori Fuzzy Model and Its Application to Optimal Feedback Control. 1. 577–581. 6 indexed citations

2.

Sakurai, Y., et al.. (2005). Large scale atm multi-stage switching network with shared buffer memory switches. 4. 121–126.

3.

Kuwahara, Hiroshi, et al.. (2003). A shared buffer memory switch for an ATM exchange. 118–122. 19 indexed citations

4.

Endo, N., et al.. (2002). Traffic characteristics evaluation of a shared buffer ATM switch. 1913–1918. 11 indexed citations

5.

Endo, N., et al.. (2002). A usage parameter control for multi-service ATM networks. 2. 946–950.

6.

Endo, N., et al.. (2002). An ATM system architecture for seamless network evolution. 2. 1839–1843. 3 indexed citations

7.

Endo, N., et al.. (1999). Large scale enterprise ATM node with per-VC traffic control. Computer Networks. 31(6). 617–625.

8.

Niu, Zhisheng, Yoshitaka Takahashi, & N. Endo. (1998). Performance Evaluation of SVC-Based IP-Over-ATM Networks. IEICE Transactions on Communications. 81(5). 948–957. 13 indexed citations

9.

Niu, Zhisheng, et al.. (1998). A Study on Performance Evaluation of SVC-based IP over ATM Networks. 1998(2). 33.

10.

Miki, Kazuho, et al.. (1995). A Connection Admission Control for ATM Networks. 95(398). 13–18. 4 indexed citations

11.

Endo, N., et al.. (1993). Shared buffer memory switch for an ATM exchange. IEEE Transactions on Communications. 41(1). 237–245. 60 indexed citations

12.

Kozaki, T., et al.. (1991). 32*32 shared buffer type ATM switch VLSIs for B-ISDNs. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications. 9(8). 1239–1247. 83 indexed citations

13.

Sakurai, Y., et al.. (1991). Large-scale ATM multistage switching network with shared buffer memory switches. IEEE Communications Magazine. 29(1). 90–96. 46 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact