N Cahir

460 total citations
8 papers, 405 citations indexed

About

N Cahir is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism and Oncology. According to data from OpenAlex, N Cahir has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 405 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Molecular Biology, 3 papers in Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism and 2 papers in Oncology. Recurrent topics in N Cahir's work include TGF-β signaling in diseases (6 papers), Growth Hormone and Insulin-like Growth Factors (3 papers) and Cell Adhesion Molecules Research (2 papers). N Cahir is often cited by papers focused on TGF-β signaling in diseases (6 papers), Growth Hormone and Insulin-like Growth Factors (3 papers) and Cell Adhesion Molecules Research (2 papers). N Cahir collaborates with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and Malaysia. N Cahir's co-authors include David Robertson, Nigel P. Groome, Henry Burger, J Sullivan, D. Healy, J. K. Findlay, D. M. Robertson, Pamela Mamers, Tracey J. Woodruff and Talia Eldar‐Geva and has published in prestigious journals such as The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, Journal of Endocrinology and Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology.

In The Last Decade

N Cahir

8 papers receiving 388 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
N Cahir Australia	8	212	174	143	56	44	8	405
Isabelle Marcillac France	5	108 0.5×	230 1.3×	151 1.1×	29 0.5×	42 1.0×	6	381
Richard E. Lappöhn Netherlands	7	129 0.6×	196 1.1×	92 0.6×	87 1.6×	24 0.5×	8	380
Niels Kryger‐Baggesen Denmark	9	107 0.5×	143 0.8×	91 0.6×	22 0.4×	58 1.3×	12	380
Atsuya Fujito Japan	8	98 0.5×	198 1.1×	105 0.7×	15 0.3×	68 1.5×	12	391
A. Romeu Spain	14	69 0.3×	359 2.1×	213 1.5×	34 0.6×	13 0.3×	29	568
L.A. Maile United Kingdom	9	84 0.4×	189 1.1×	49 0.3×	63 1.1×	18 0.4×	10	350
Frank Meloni United States	10	50 0.2×	107 0.6×	96 0.7×	44 0.8×	9 0.2×	17	370
Ritsuo Honda Japan	10	50 0.2×	109 0.6×	118 0.8×	15 0.3×	48 1.1×	23	323
Gracy X. Rosario India	11	86 0.4×	183 1.1×	81 0.6×	7 0.1×	22 0.5×	13	501
Francesca Cioppi Italy	10	140 0.7×	155 0.9×	78 0.5×	32 0.6×	20 0.5×	20	294

Countries citing papers authored by N Cahir

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of N Cahir's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by N Cahir with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites N Cahir more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by N Cahir

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by N Cahir. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by N Cahir. The network helps show where N Cahir may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of N Cahir

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of N Cahir. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of N Cahir based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with N Cahir. N Cahir is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

8 of 8 papers shown

1.

Robertson, D. M., Terence Stephenson, N Cahir, et al.. (2001). Development of an inhibin α subunit ELISA with broad specificity. Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology. 180(1-2). 79–86. 26 indexed citations

2.

Eldar‐Geva, Talia, David Robertson, N Cahir, et al.. (2000). Relationship between Serum Inhibin A and B and Ovarian Follicle Development after a Daily Fixed Dose Administration of Recombinant Follicle-Stimulating Hormone¹. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. 85(2). 607–613. 57 indexed citations

3.

Burger, Henry, Anna Baillie, Ann E. Drummond, et al.. (1998). Inhibin and ovarian cancer. Journal of Reproductive Immunology. 39(1-2). 77–87. 34 indexed citations

4.

Robertson, David, N Cahir, J. K. Findlay, Henry Burger, & Nigel P. Groome. (1997). The Biological and Immunological Characterization of Inhibin A and B Forms in Human Follicular Fluid and Plasma1. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. 82(3). 889–896. 88 indexed citations

5.

Burger, Henry, David Robertson, N Cahir, et al.. (1996). Characterization of inhibin immunoreactivity in post‐menopausal women with ovarian tumours. Clinical Endocrinology. 44(4). 413–418. 50 indexed citations

6.

Robertson, David, Henry Burger, J Sullivan, et al.. (1996). Biological and immunological characterization of inhibin forms in human plasma.. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. 81(2). 669–676. 75 indexed citations

7.

Robertson, D. M., et al.. (1995). Inhibin forms in human plasma. Journal of Endocrinology. 144(2). 261–269. 45 indexed citations

8.

Robertson, David, Paul G. Farnworth, Iain J. Clarke, et al.. (1990). Effects of bovine 35 kDa FSH-suppressing protein on FSH and LH in rat pituitary cells in vitro: comparison with bovine 31 kDa inhibin. Journal of Endocrinology. 124(3). 417–423. 30 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact