N. Bradley Keele
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 5%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Molecular Biology
- Pollution top 10%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 10%
- Co-authors
- Patricia Shinnick‐GallagherVolker NeugebauerV. L. ArvanovLee TranGeorgianna G. GouldJason P. BerningerKristin A. ConnorsTheodore W. Valenti
- Topics
- Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (17 papers)Memory and Neural Mechanisms (15 papers)Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesSwitzerland
In The Last Decade
N. Bradley Keele
19 papers receiving 666 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 433
- Cognitive Neuroscience 230
- Molecular Biology 191
- Pollution 122
- Psychiatry and Mental health 110
Countries citing papers authored by N. Bradley Keele
This map shows the geographic impact of N. Bradley Keele's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by N. Bradley Keele with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites N. Bradley Keele more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by N. Bradley Keele
This network shows the impact of papers produced by N. Bradley Keele. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by N. Bradley Keele. The network helps show where N. Bradley Keele may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of N. Bradley Keele
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of N. Bradley Keele. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of N. Bradley Keele based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with N. Bradley Keele. N. Bradley Keele is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8 | |
| 2 | 14 | |
| 3 | 27 | |
| 4 | 11 | |
| 5 | 155 | |
| 6 | 11 | |
| 7 | 11 | |
| 8 | 50 | |
| 9 | 10 | |
| 10 | 13 | |
| 11 | 27 | |
| 12 | 23 | |
| 13 | 66 | |
| 14 | 43 | |
| 15 | 25 | |
| 16 | 72 | |
| 17 | 48 | |
| 18 | 42 | |
| 19 | 25 |
About N. Bradley Keele
N. Bradley Keele is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Cognitive Neuroscience and Behavioral Neuroscience, having authored 19 papers that have together received 681 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (17 papers), Memory and Neural Mechanisms (15 papers) and Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (433 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (44 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (230 citations). N. Bradley Keele has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Patricia Shinnick‐Gallagher, Volker Neugebauer, V. L. Arvanov, Lee Tran, Georgianna G. Gould, Jason P. Berninger, Kristin A. Connors, Theodore W. Valenti, Krista N. Prosser and Bryan W. Brooks. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Neuroscience, Environmental Science & Technology and The Journal of Physiology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.