N. Bachman

416 total citations · 1 hit paper
11 papers, 265 citations indexed

About

N. Bachman is a scholar working on Aerospace Engineering, Astronomy and Astrophysics and Computer Networks and Communications. According to data from OpenAlex, N. Bachman has authored 11 papers receiving a total of 265 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Aerospace Engineering, 5 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics and 2 papers in Computer Networks and Communications. Recurrent topics in N. Bachman's work include Space Exploration and Technology (4 papers), Spacecraft Design and Technology (4 papers) and Planetary Science and Exploration (3 papers). N. Bachman is often cited by papers focused on Space Exploration and Technology (4 papers), Spacecraft Design and Technology (4 papers) and Planetary Science and Exploration (3 papers). N. Bachman collaborates with scholars based in United States, Japan and Spain. N. Bachman's co-authors include C. H. Acton, Б. Семенов, E. D. Wright, L. S. Elson, Yukio Yamamoto, F. S. Turner, W. M. Folkner, James L. Hilton and Ian Underwood and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Planetary and Space Science and Astrodynamics Conference.

In The Last Decade

N. Bachman

11 papers receiving 248 citations

Hit Papers

A look towards the future in the handling of space scienc... 2017 2026 2020 2023 2017 50 100 150 200

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
N. Bachman United States 4 205 112 27 21 16 11 265
E. D. Wright United States 4 203 1.0× 111 1.0× 27 1.0× 21 1.0× 15 0.9× 8 262
Б. Семенов United States 7 291 1.4× 137 1.2× 42 1.6× 22 1.0× 17 1.1× 18 380
Theodore H. Sweetser United States 10 288 1.4× 272 2.4× 25 0.9× 41 2.0× 11 0.7× 43 392
E. DeJong United States 7 300 1.5× 83 0.7× 61 2.3× 17 0.8× 40 2.5× 25 366
Stefano Santandrea Netherlands 8 94 0.5× 106 0.9× 18 0.7× 33 1.6× 8 0.5× 31 246
Philipp Gläser Germany 11 368 1.8× 202 1.8× 29 1.1× 17 0.8× 6 0.4× 38 431
K. Cahoy United States 11 223 1.1× 115 1.0× 38 1.4× 12 0.6× 11 0.7× 21 345
Takashi Kominato Japan 7 267 1.3× 178 1.6× 32 1.2× 10 0.5× 13 0.8× 14 327
Julie Kangas United States 9 212 1.0× 136 1.2× 17 0.6× 16 0.8× 10 0.6× 29 283
T. Duxbury United States 2 349 1.7× 74 0.7× 53 2.0× 34 1.6× 35 2.2× 3 381

Countries citing papers authored by N. Bachman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of N. Bachman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by N. Bachman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites N. Bachman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by N. Bachman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by N. Bachman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by N. Bachman. The network helps show where N. Bachman may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of N. Bachman

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of N. Bachman. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of N. Bachman based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with N. Bachman. N. Bachman is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
1.
Bachman, N.. (2017). The SPICE Digital Shape Kernel (DSK) Subsystem. LPICo. 1986. 7015. 1 indexed citations
2.
Acton, C. H., N. Bachman, Б. Семенов, & E. D. Wright. (2017). A look towards the future in the handling of space science mission geometry. Planetary and Space Science. 150. 9–12. 233 indexed citations breakdown →
3.
Acton, C. H., N. Bachman, Б. Семенов, & E. D. Wright. (2016). SPICE TOOLS SUPPORTING PLANETARY REMOTE SENSING. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. XLI-B4. 357–359. 11 indexed citations
4.
Acton, C. H., N. Bachman, Б. Семенов, & E. D. Wright. (2015). SPICE Supports Planetary Science Observation Geometry. DPS. 1 indexed citations
5.
Acton, C. H., N. Bachman, W. M. Folkner, & James L. Hilton. (2015). SPICE as an IAU Recommendation for Planetary Ephemerides. 29. 2240327. 1 indexed citations
6.
Acton, C. H., et al.. (2011). SPICE: A Means for Determining Observation Geometry. 2011. 32. 7 indexed citations
7.
Семенов, Б., C. H. Acton, N. Bachman, L. S. Elson, & E. D. Wright. (2005). Reducing costs of managing and accessing navigation and ancillary data by relying on the extensive capabilities of NASA's spice system. NASA Technical Reports Server (NASA). 601. 2 indexed citations
8.
Acton, C. H., N. Bachman, L. S. Elson, Б. Семенов, & E. D. Wright. (2003). SPICE: a real example of data system re-use to reduce the costs of ground data systems development and mission operations. NASA Technical Reports Server (NASA). 1 indexed citations
9.
10.
Acton, C. H., N. Bachman, Б. Семенов, F. S. Turner, & E. D. Wright. (2001). SPICE products and services available to the planetary cartography community. NASA Technical Reports Server (NASA). 1 indexed citations
11.
Underwood, Ian, et al.. (1990). The near real time image navigation of pictures returned by Voyager 2 at Neptune. Astrodynamics Conference. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026