MW Büchler
- Oncology top 2%
- Surgery top 10%
- Epidemiology top 10%
- Cancer Research top 5%
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine top 10%
- Co-authors
- Helmut FrießJohn P. NeoptolemosP. PederzoliF LacaineC. DervenisDJ KerrH. G. BegerJanet Dunn
- Topics
- Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research (3 papers)Viral gastroenteritis research and epidemiology (1 paper)Cell death mechanisms and regulation (1 paper)
- Cited by
- OncologyCancer ResearchEpidemiology
- Partner nations
- SwitzerlandGermanyUnited States
In The Last Decade
MW Büchler
8 papers receiving 1.2k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
- Oncology 1.0k
- Surgery 391
- Epidemiology 368
- Cancer Research 355
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 335
Countries citing papers authored by MW Büchler
This map shows the geographic impact of MW Büchler's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by MW Büchler with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites MW Büchler more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by MW Büchler
This network shows the impact of papers produced by MW Büchler. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by MW Büchler. The network helps show where MW Büchler may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of MW Büchler
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of MW Büchler. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of MW Büchler based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with MW Büchler. MW Büchler is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 41 | |
| 2 | [Expression of connective tissue growth factor (CTGF) in pancreatic cancer]. | 3 |
| 3 | Differential expression of TRAIL-R3 and TRAIL-R4 in human pancreatic cancer. | 12 |
| 4 | Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy and chemotherapy in resectable pancreatic cancer: a randomised controlled trialbreakdown → | 773 |
| 5 | Mucin (MUC) gene expression in human pancreatic adenocarcinoma and chronic pancreatitis: a potential role of MUC4 as a tumor marker of diagnostic significance. | 218 |
| 6 | 177 | |
| 7 | 21 | |
| 8 | 14 |
About MW Büchler
MW Büchler is a scholar working on Oncology, Biotechnology and Animal Science and Zoology, having authored 8 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research (3 papers), Viral gastroenteritis research and epidemiology (1 paper) and Cell death mechanisms and regulation (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Oncology (1.0k citations), Cancer Research (355 citations) and Epidemiology (368 citations). MW Büchler has collaborated with scholars based in Switzerland, Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include Helmut Frieß, John P. Neoptolemos, P. Pederzoli, F Lacaine, C. Dervenis, DJ Kerr, H. G. Beger, Janet Dunn, Massimo Falconi and Deborah Stocken. Their work appears in journals such as The Lancet, British Journal of Cancer and International Journal of Oncology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.