Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Tolerance of normal tissue to therapeutic irradiation
19913.4k citationsBahman Emami, J. Lyman et al.International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physicsprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Murray Wesson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Murray Wesson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Murray Wesson more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Murray Wesson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Murray Wesson. The network helps show where Murray Wesson may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Murray Wesson
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Murray Wesson.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Murray Wesson based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Murray Wesson. Murray Wesson is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Wesson, Murray. (2016). Crafting a Concept of Deference for the Implied Freedom of Political Communication. Saint Louis University public law review. 27. 101–108.
7.
Wesson, Murray. (2015). Tajjour V New South Wales, Freedom of Association, and the High Court's Uneven Embrace of Proportionality Review. UWA Profiles and Research Repository (University of Western Australia). 40. 102–110.2 indexed citations
Wesson, Murray. (2011). Reasonableness in Retreat? The Judgment of the South African Constitutional Court in Mazibuko v City of Johannesburg. SSRN Electronic Journal.3 indexed citations
Wesson, Murray. (2007). Discrimination Law and Social Rights: Intersections and Possibilities. UWA Profiles and Research Repository (University of Western Australia).1 indexed citations
13.
Wesson, Murray. (2007). Equality and Social Rights: An Exploration in Light of the South African Constitution. UWA Profiles and Research Repository (University of Western Australia). 748–769.6 indexed citations
14.
Wesson, Murray. (2005). Social Condition and Social Rights. UWA Profiles and Research Repository (University of Western Australia). 69(1). 101–117.1 indexed citations
15.
Wesson, Murray. (2004). Grootboom and Beyond: Reassessing the Socio-Economic Jurisprudence of the South African Constitutional Court. UWA Profiles and Research Repository (University of Western Australia).
Emami, Bahman, J. Lyman, Adam S. Brown, et al.. (1991). Tolerance of normal tissue to therapeutic irradiation. International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics. 21(1). 109–122.3371 indexed citations breakdown →
18.
Eisenberg, David, Murray Wesson, & Masahiro Yamashita. (1989). Interpretation of protein folding and binding with atomic solvation parameters. 29. 217–222.64 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.