Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Tolerance of normal tissue to therapeutic irradiation
19913.4k citationsBahman Emami, J. Lyman et al.International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physicsprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of J. Lyman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. Lyman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. Lyman more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. Lyman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. Lyman. The network helps show where J. Lyman may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of J. Lyman
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J. Lyman.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J. Lyman based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with J. Lyman. J. Lyman is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Emami, Bahman, J. Lyman, Adam S. Brown, et al.. (1991). Tolerance of normal tissue to therapeutic irradiation. International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics. 21(1). 109–122.3371 indexed citations breakdown →
Lyman, J.. (1982). Supercomputers demand innovation in packaging and cooling. OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information). 19. 28–31.2 indexed citations
10.
Woodruff, Katie, John T. Leith, P. Powers-Risius, et al.. (1979). Comparison of heavy particle with X-irradiation on the hamster lung.. PubMed. 95(3). 765–74.2 indexed citations
Wiedemann, Eckehart, et al.. (1977). Heavy particle therapy: pituitary tumors.. Munich Personal RePEc Archive (Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich). 42(3-4). 175–89.5 indexed citations
13.
Lyman, J., et al.. (1976). Supplemental sensory feedback for the VA/NU myoelectric hand. Background and preliminary designs.. PubMed. 170–91.33 indexed citations
14.
Tobias, Cornelius A., Thomas F. Budinger, & J. Lyman. (1972). Human visual response to nuclear particle exposures. NASA Technical Reports Server (NASA).6 indexed citations
Smith, Harold H., et al.. (1969). RESPONSES IN MUTATION, GROWTH INHIBITION, TUMORIZATION AND ISOZYME MULTIPLICITY FROM EXPOSING SEEDS TO IRRADIATIONS OF DIFFERENT LINEAR ENERGY TRANSFER.. OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information).1 indexed citations
18.
Lawrence, John H., et al.. (1963). HEAVY-PARTICLE IONIZATION (He,Li,B,Ne) AND THE PROLIFERATIVE CAPACITY OF NEOPLASTIC CELLS $sub 4$IN VIVO.$sub 4$.2 indexed citations
19.
Brustad, Tor, Piero E. Ariotti, & J. Lyman. (1960). EXPERIMENTAL SETUP AND DOSIMETRY FOR INVESTIGATING BIOLOGICAL EFFECTS ON DENSELY IONIZING RADIATIONS. OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information).11 indexed citations
20.
Lyman, J., et al.. (1954). Human tolerance for high temperature aircraft environments.. PubMed. 25(5). 515–22.9 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.