MUF Kirschbaum

549 total citations
9 papers, 457 citations indexed

About

MUF Kirschbaum is a scholar working on Global and Planetary Change, Plant Science and Nature and Landscape Conservation. According to data from OpenAlex, MUF Kirschbaum has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 457 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Global and Planetary Change, 6 papers in Plant Science and 4 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation. Recurrent topics in MUF Kirschbaum's work include Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (6 papers), Plant responses to elevated CO2 (3 papers) and Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics (2 papers). MUF Kirschbaum is often cited by papers focused on Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (6 papers), Plant responses to elevated CO2 (3 papers) and Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics (2 papers). MUF Kirschbaum collaborates with scholars based in New Zealand and Australia. MUF Kirschbaum's co-authors include Graham D. Farquhar, R. N. Cromer, H. N. Comins, Ying‐Ping Wang, S. Pongracic, R. J. Raison, J.F. McGrath, Peter Ritson, Guillaume Simioni and Bob Carswell and has published in prestigious journals such as Tree Physiology, Canadian Journal of Forest Research and Functional Plant Biology.

In The Last Decade

MUF Kirschbaum

9 papers receiving 401 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
MUF Kirschbaum New Zealand	8	349	261	136	74	70	9	457
Zsofia R. Stangl Sweden	11	303 0.9×	249 1.0×	105 0.8×	126 1.7×	54 0.8×	14	447
Pille Mänd Estonia	7	239 0.7×	124 0.5×	87 0.6×	55 0.7×	54 0.8×	9	370
Jeff W. G. Kelly Australia	6	340 1.0×	269 1.0×	110 0.8×	92 1.2×	34 0.5×	7	464
Nadia S. Arias Argentina	10	220 0.6×	184 0.7×	72 0.5×	113 1.5×	48 0.7×	19	333
Camille Ziegler France	11	335 1.0×	215 0.8×	161 1.2×	171 2.3×	40 0.6×	20	461
Blake Farnsworth United States	7	257 0.7×	195 0.7×	121 0.9×	95 1.3×	24 0.3×	9	338
Kathrin Streit Switzerland	9	231 0.7×	147 0.6×	90 0.7×	196 2.6×	127 1.8×	19	405
Kirk R. Wythers United States	7	289 0.8×	150 0.6×	92 0.7×	60 0.8×	24 0.3×	9	356
Ronald S. Waschmann United States	13	186 0.5×	122 0.5×	115 0.8×	124 1.7×	34 0.5×	20	325
Carolin Koerner Germany	3	232 0.7×	204 0.8×	73 0.5×	100 1.4×	11 0.2×	3	319

Countries citing papers authored by MUF Kirschbaum

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of MUF Kirschbaum's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by MUF Kirschbaum with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites MUF Kirschbaum more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by MUF Kirschbaum

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by MUF Kirschbaum. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by MUF Kirschbaum. The network helps show where MUF Kirschbaum may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of MUF Kirschbaum

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of MUF Kirschbaum. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of MUF Kirschbaum based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with MUF Kirschbaum. MUF Kirschbaum is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

9 of 9 papers shown

1.

Dymond, J. R., et al.. (2012). Opportunities for restoring indigenous forest in New Zealand. Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand. 43(3). 141–153. 10 indexed citations

2.

Simioni, Guillaume, et al.. (2009). The carbon budget of Pinus radiata plantations in south-western Australia under four climate change scenarios. Tree Physiology. 29(9). 1081–1093. 17 indexed citations

3.

Pongracic, S., MUF Kirschbaum, & R. J. Raison. (1997). Comparison of soda lime and infrared gas analysis techniques for in situ measurement of forest soil respiration. Canadian Journal of Forest Research. 27(11). 1890–1895. 25 indexed citations

4.

Kirschbaum, MUF, et al.. (1992). Growth Analysis of the Effect of Phosphorus Nutrition on Seedings of Eucalyptus grandis. Functional Plant Biology. 19(1). 55–55. 40 indexed citations

5.

Comins, H. N., et al.. (1992). Modifying Existing Forest Growth Models to Take Account of Effects of Elevated CO2. Australian Journal of Botany. 40(5). 657–677. 65 indexed citations

6.

Cromer, R. N., et al.. (1992). A Model of Nutrient Response in Eucalyptus grandis Seedlings. Functional Plant Biology. 19(5). 459–459. 25 indexed citations

7.

Kirschbaum, MUF. (1991). Effects of Photon Flux Density on Nutrient Productivity in Eucalyptus grandis Seedlings. Functional Plant Biology. 18(3). 307–307. 4 indexed citations

8.

Kirschbaum, MUF, et al.. (1990). Photosynthetic Responses to Phosphorus Nutrition in Eucalyptus grandis Seedlings. Functional Plant Biology. 17(5). 527–527. 71 indexed citations

9.

Kirschbaum, MUF & Graham D. Farquhar. (1984). Temperature Dependence of Whole-Leaf Photosynthesis in Eucalyptus pauciflora Sieb. Ex Spreng. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology. 11(6). 519–538. 200 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact