M.S. Kops

472 total citations
7 papers, 363 citations indexed

About

M.S. Kops is a scholar working on Small Animals, Social Psychology and Animal Science and Zoology. According to data from OpenAlex, M.S. Kops has authored 7 papers receiving a total of 363 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Small Animals, 4 papers in Social Psychology and 4 papers in Animal Science and Zoology. Recurrent topics in M.S. Kops's work include Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (4 papers), Animal Nutrition and Physiology (4 papers) and Primate Behavior and Ecology (4 papers). M.S. Kops is often cited by papers focused on Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (4 papers), Animal Nutrition and Physiology (4 papers) and Primate Behavior and Ecology (4 papers). M.S. Kops collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, Germany and United Kingdom. M.S. Kops's co-authors include T.B. Rodenburg, E.N. de Haas, Monique Bestman, Bernd Riedstra, I.C. de Jong, Jan-Paul Wagenaar, Christine J Nicol, Rebecca E. Nordquist, M.M. van Krimpen and E.D. Ellen and has published in prestigious journals such as Behavioural Brain Research, Physiology & Behavior and World s Poultry Science Journal.

In The Last Decade

M.S. Kops

7 papers receiving 354 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
M.S. Kops Netherlands	7	273	210	66	40	33	7	363
R.L. Dennis United States	12	508 1.9×	179 0.9×	39 0.6×	41 1.0×	45 1.4×	19	632
Anette Wichman Sweden	12	384 1.4×	315 1.5×	72 1.1×	69 1.7×	26 0.8×	23	517
Fernanda M. Tahamtani Norway	16	579 2.1×	424 2.0×	79 1.2×	54 1.4×	18 0.5×	41	727
Y.M. van Hierden Netherlands	7	344 1.3×	281 1.3×	111 1.7×	114 2.9×	22 0.7×	9	513
R.E. Koopmanschap Netherlands	12	284 1.0×	243 1.2×	64 1.0×	28 0.7×	41 1.2×	28	456
Johanna de Groot Netherlands	7	181 0.7×	213 1.0×	78 1.2×	26 0.7×	16 0.5×	7	344
Gina Caplen United Kingdom	13	413 1.5×	392 1.9×	34 0.5×	58 1.4×	9 0.3×	20	549
Laura Dixon United Kingdom	14	336 1.2×	280 1.3×	39 0.6×	35 0.9×	82 2.5×	31	651
G. Gvaryahu Israel	12	340 1.2×	217 1.0×	56 0.8×	109 2.7×	13 0.4×	29	537
J. S. Mann India	11	351 1.3×	229 1.1×	19 0.3×	87 2.2×	19 0.6×	36	519

Countries citing papers authored by M.S. Kops

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M.S. Kops's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M.S. Kops with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M.S. Kops more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M.S. Kops

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M.S. Kops. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M.S. Kops. The network helps show where M.S. Kops may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of M.S. Kops

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of M.S. Kops. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of M.S. Kops based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with M.S. Kops. M.S. Kops is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

7 of 7 papers shown

1.

Kops, M.S., J.B. Kjær, Onur Güntürkün, et al.. (2017). Brain monoamine levels and behaviour of young and adult chickens genetically selected on feather pecking. Behavioural Brain Research. 327. 11–20. 35 indexed citations

2.

Kops, M.S., J.B. Kjær, Onur Güntürkün, et al.. (2014). Serotonin release in the caudal nidopallium of adult laying hens genetically selected for high and low feather pecking behavior: An in vivo microdialysis study. Behavioural Brain Research. 268. 81–87. 10 indexed citations

3.

Kops, M.S., E.N. de Haas, T.B. Rodenburg, et al.. (2013). Effects of feather pecking phenotype (severe feather peckers, victims and non-peckers) on serotonergic and dopaminergic activity in four brain areas of laying hens (Gallus gallus domesticus). Physiology & Behavior. 120. 77–82. 41 indexed citations

4.

Bruin, Natasja de, et al.. (2013). Effects of risperidone, clozapine and the 5-HT6 antagonist GSK-742457 on PCP-induced deficits in reversal learning in the two-lever operant task in male Sprague Dawley rats. Behavioural Brain Research. 244. 15–28. 22 indexed citations

5.

Kops, M.S., E.N. de Haas, T.B. Rodenburg, et al.. (2013). Selection for low mortality in laying hens affects catecholamine levels in the arcopallium, a brain area involved in fear and motor regulation. Behavioural Brain Research. 257. 54–61. 19 indexed citations

6.

Rodenburg, T.B., M.M. van Krimpen, I.C. de Jong, et al.. (2013). The prevention and control of feather pecking in laying hens: identifying the underlying principles. World s Poultry Science Journal. 69(2). 361–374. 188 indexed citations

7.

Haas, E.N. de, M.S. Kops, J.E. Bolhuis, et al.. (2012). The relation between fearfulness in young and stress-response in adult laying hens, on individual and group level. Physiology & Behavior. 107(3). 433–439. 48 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact