Moty Pansky

1.6k citations
51 papers · 1.1k indexed · h-index 19

Impact in

Papers in

Moty Pansky

51 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers

Moty Pansky
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 469
  • Reproductive Medicine 476
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 381
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 208
  • Surgery 329
Replace Gary N. Frishman with:
Gary N. Frishman United States
P. Capmas France
Howard T. Sharp United States
T G Stovall United States
Thoralf Schollmeyer Germany
Ümit Göktolga Türkiye
Alison Jacoby United States
Franco Borruto Italy
Roy Mashiach Israel
Alfred Cutner United Kingdom
Moty Pansky relative to Gary N. Frishman United States Gary N. Frishman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Gary N. Frishman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Moty Pansky

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Moty Pansky's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Moty Pansky with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Moty Pansky more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Moty Pansky

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Moty Pansky. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Moty Pansky. The network helps show where Moty Pansky may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Moty Pansky, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Moty Pansky Line = papers co-authored together Moty Pansky links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20251
2 20217
3 201817
4 201718
5 201713
6 20154
7 201527
8 201415
9 201377
10 20122
11 20124
12 20105
13 200914
14
Paraovarian cysts of neoplastic origin are underreported.
200924
15 200948
16 200858
17 200768
18 200456
19 200410
20 20047

About Moty Pansky

Moty Pansky is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, Reproductive Medicine, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Surgery, having authored 51 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (20 papers), Gynecological conditions and treatments (17 papers), Ectopic Pregnancy Diagnosis and Management (13 papers), Uterine Myomas and Treatments (13 papers), Hernia repair and management (8 papers), Maternal and fetal healthcare (8 papers), Reproductive Health and Contraception (7 papers) and Gastrointestinal disorders and treatments (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (469 citations), Reproductive Medicine (476 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (381 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (208 citations) and Surgery (329 citations). Moty Pansky has collaborated with scholars based in Israel and United States. Frequent co-authors include Noam Smorgick, Reuvit Halperin, Zvi Vaknin, David F. Schneider, Ron Maymon, Arie Herman, Ido Ben‐Ami, Noga Fuchs Weizman, Oshri Barel and Yaakov Melcer. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, Fertility and Sterility and Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026