Morrie Baum

1.9k citations
76 papers · 1.5k indexed · h-index 21

Impact in

Papers in

Morrie Baum

75 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

Morrie Baum
Comparison fields: 5 of 108
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 282
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 681
  • General Psychology 43
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 371
  • Rehabilitation 139
Replace Lawrence S. Sklar with:
Lawrence S. Sklar Canada
Leo V. DiCara United States
E. Gellhorn United States
Gary D. Coover United States
Michael M. Patterson United States
Dennis D. Kelly United States
Raymond L. Jackson United States
M Jouvet France
Teresa E. Foley United States
Roberto Galvez United States
Morrie Baum relative to Lawrence S. Sklar Canada Lawrence S. Sklar's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×14.3×
Lawrence S. Sklar · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Morrie Baum

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Morrie Baum's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Morrie Baum with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Morrie Baum more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Morrie Baum

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Morrie Baum. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Morrie Baum. The network helps show where Morrie Baum may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 21 scholars most cited alongside Morrie Baum, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Morrie Baum Line = papers co-authored together Morrie Baum links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 2001127
2 199916
3 199736
4 19972
5 19968
6 199518
7 199434
8 199012
9 19873
10 19857
11 19852
12
Proceedings: The effect of oestrogen on the proliferation of monocyte/macrophage precursors in the bone marrow of mice.
19762
13 197417
14 197227
15 19713
16 196818
17 19689
18 19684
19
Disappointments of pancreatic scintiscanning.
19684
20 19656

About Morrie Baum

Morrie Baum is a scholar working on Behavioral Neuroscience, Cognitive Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and General Psychology, having authored 76 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Memory and Neural Mechanisms (35 papers), Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (22 papers), Stress Responses and Cortisol (20 papers), Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior (11 papers), Exercise and Physiological Responses (9 papers), Behavioral and Psychological Studies (8 papers), Muscle metabolism and nutrition (6 papers) and Zebrafish Biomedical Research Applications (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Behavioral Neuroscience (282 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (681 citations), General Psychology (43 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (371 citations) and Rehabilitation (139 citations). Morrie Baum has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Michael W. Weiss, H. Liesen, Zalman Amit, Arthur Gordon, Israel I. Lederhendler, Holger Kirchner, Peter G. Jaffe, C T Howe, Ernest G. Poser and Christiane Stock. Their work appears in journals such as Behaviour Research and Therapy, European Journal of Applied Physiology, Psychopharmacology, Physiology & Behavior and International Journal of Sports Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026