Mook Bangalore
- Sociology and Political Science top 2%
- Global and Planetary Change top 5%
- Soil Science top 2%
- Economics and Econometrics top 5%
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 5%
- Co-authors
- Stéphane HallegatteAdrien Vogt‐SchilbJulie RozenbergUlf NarlochTed VeldkampMarianne FayLaura BonzanigoChloé Beaudet
- Topics
- Agricultural risk and resilience (10 papers)Disaster Management and Resilience (6 papers)Flood Risk Assessment and Management (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomAustria
In The Last Decade
Mook Bangalore
21 papers receiving 1.4k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 104
- Sociology and Political Science 659
- Global and Planetary Change 572
- Soil Science 344
- Economics and Econometrics 301
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 190
Countries citing papers authored by Mook Bangalore
This map shows the geographic impact of Mook Bangalore's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mook Bangalore with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mook Bangalore more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mook Bangalore
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mook Bangalore. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mook Bangalore. The network helps show where Mook Bangalore may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mook Bangalore
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mook Bangalore. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mook Bangalore based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mook Bangalore. Mook Bangalore is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 17 | |
| 2 | 9 | |
| 3 | 27 | |
| 4 | 82 | |
| 5 | 33 | |
| 6 | 212 | |
| 7 | 18 | |
| 8 | 26 | |
| 9 | 17 | |
| 10 | 24 | |
| 11 | 9 | |
| 12 | 8 | |
| 13 | Unbreakable: Building the Resilience of the Poor in the Face of Natural Disastersbreakdown → | 301 |
| 14 | Socio-Economic Resilience to Floods in 90 Countries | 1 |
| 15 | Disaster risk and poverty: assessing the global exposure of the poor to floods and droughts | 2 |
| 16 | 8 | |
| 17 | 54 | |
| 18 | 12 | |
| 19 | Shock Waves: Managing the Impacts of Climate Change on Povertybreakdown → | 426 |
| 20 | 43 |
About Mook Bangalore
Mook Bangalore is a scholar working on Soil Science, Global and Planetary Change and Pollution, having authored 21 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Agricultural risk and resilience (10 papers), Disaster Management and Resilience (6 papers) and Flood Risk Assessment and Management (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Soil Science (344 citations), Global and Planetary Change (572 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (659 citations). Mook Bangalore has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Austria. Frequent co-authors include Stéphane Hallegatte, Adrien Vogt‐Schilb, Julie Rozenberg, Ulf Narloch, Ted Veldkamp, Marianne Fay, Laura Bonzanigo, Chloé Beaudet, David Tréguer and Tamaro Kane. Their work appears in journals such as Environmental Health Perspectives, Renewable Energy and The Lancet Planetary Health.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.